In 2013, Nissan surprised all the new generation car Nissan. X-TRAIL - T35. For some, surprise has become pleasant, for someone - on the contrary, no one left indifferent. Everything is known in comparison - here we will compare new Nissan With Mazda CX 5, which managed to become a recognized standard. So, Mazda CX 5 VS Nissanx-Trail - and let the strongest wins!
Engine and chassis
Extreme generation popular crossover Nissan. The X-TRAIL saw the light recently - in 2013. Designers Nissan especially did not hide them that they worked with a loaf at Mazda CX 5 2016, as on the main competitor. This is evidenced by the similarity of many characteristics. For example, litter of gasoline engines. Only here to achieve similar power to the Masters from Nissan failed. However, judge for yourself:
Sorry for the banality, but the result is obvious.
Reference! The engine power directly affects the maximum speed, which for Nissan is 180 km / h (Mazda - at 20km / h more).Mazda is confidently leading and in dynamics - the symbolic frontier 100km / h from the place of CX 5 intersects for 8.9 seconds, while Nissan X-Trail is more than 11.
Especially insulting for the Nissanovsky diesel, which was clearly designed on the residual principle - "to be". In addition to a very weak diesel goes mechanical box Transmissions - no options.
But "gasoline" options for Nissan X-Trail, which clearly use greater love of designers, equipped with an automatic machine or variator. The luxury, inaccessible to Mazda fans, on which the variator does not put Niza as never, guided by anyone in an unknown principle.
If we talk about the Wheel Mazda 5 or Nissan X Trail, it does not differ - 2x4 with the leading front wheeled pair for both cars. However, Nissan buyers are optionally available connected rear axle bridge.
Important! Drivers marked the best handling of Mazda CX 5: Following the sport style, the designers have reduced the back of the steering wheel to a minimum, the car's response to the actions of the driver is almost instant.At the same time, Nissan X trails with a noticeable delay.
Exterior
The last generation of the X-Trail T32 series is available on the new CMF modular platform. It is it that is the base for another crossover from Nissan - the legendary Qashqai. Is it worth wondering that in the end, the new X-trail is much more like daddy than on his own predecessors in the series?
Given that the new X-Trail exceeds Qashqai in all respects, resembling it outwardly, it seems that Nissan designers wanted to do as Casca, only better. It is commendable, of course, only it is not clear why this goal was embodied on the basis of X-trail. Of course, a rectangular, rude, with a Kaban's eye front X-Trail-T31 was not a handsome man, but had his range of brutal style fans a la sout-road. And fans a new look clearly did not like.
The new Nissan became more Europeanized, trying to be a more urban car than an SUV (the lost all-wheel drive also says about this), but he lost its gross identity. Can Nissan X-Trail be among your Porsche and BMW - a rhetorical question.
And here it is impossible not to note the advantage of Mazda CX 5 with its faithfulness of once the elected concept of Kodo - the "soul in motion", embodied in every detail of the silhouette forward, embodying its elegant circuit breeds and dedication.
Summarizing Exterior Review: For those who wish to acquire an unconditionally stylish and elegant car A la Europe, but cheaper, Nissan X-Trailt-32 is an excellent choice. Connoisseurs of eastern identity and loyalty unified style Mazda CX 5 will suit more.
Interior
The functionality of the equipment of the driver's seat Mazda and Nissan is almost the same, the differences relate (again) stylistics. If the interior of Mazda CX 5 rests on its progressiveness and modernity, the overall impression is something average between the plane and sports car, the main mood of the "insides" of Nissan X-Trail is classicism.
Example! The main part of the front panel Mazda CX 5 is a multimedia screen, although drowning into the torpedo, but occupying a central place, deposit on the head as evidence of technocraticness. A similar screen in the center of Nissan "shot" down, practically hitting with a radio tape recorder and freed the place of the climate control ventilation system deflectors.At first glance, all the same, but a completely different sensation is an excellent sample of a different approach to design.
Touched the difference I. dashboard - In Nissan, it is much less "sports" than in Mazda. The speedometer and tachometer dominate, and the indicator of the engine parameters, which in Mazda is one of the leading elements, Nissan is much more modest. Classic scheme - In truth, classic in everything!
It should be noted that Nissan X-Trail is only pretended by less progressive. Reviews indicate that many users prefer the inner equipment of Nissan, considering it more perfect. The upper hatch, electric seats with position memory, increased comfort, especially on the rear seats, which stands out even on the background very advanced in this respect Mazda CX 5.
Many people like the rear view camera - an indispensable assistant at parking. The camera lens is equipped with a washer.
Prices for both cars are approximately the same - 1400-1500 thousand rubles. Diesel Nissan X-Trail with manual gearbox can be purchased by 100-200 thousand cheaper. The cost will not clearly be a decisive factor when choosing Nissan X Trail or Mazda CX-5.
Summing up, we note: Nissan X-Trail is an excellent car, albeit the Mazda in speed and power, with more than compensates for the lag behind the comfort of the interior. Mazda CX 5 - the choice of those who want a fast and stylish car.
comparisons and Reviews of Machines
Automotive manufacturers have long realized that the future is just for compact crossovers. Since the cars of this class combine comfort and handling, which are not much inferior to those of simple sedans, a spacious salon, great for the transport of a wide variety of cargo trunk and increased patency. All right in many crossovers and with fuel consumption. Due to the verified aerodynamics and relatively small mass, their appetite is at a very acceptable level. Minus, perhaps, only one - choose suitable car Of the few dozen options are very difficult.
Before the acquisition, you have to perform a good dozen test drives, ringing the random dealers and spend the days for the study of automotive publications, websites, branded booklets, schemes and tables. Otherwise in no way. And at the end of all this, it is usually unable to dwell on some particular car. Who, for example, choose from a couple of Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5? The price tag on both cars is actually monotonous, the level of equipment is also.
Without a very thorough comparison, you can not do.
- 1 exterior and interior
- 2 Characteristics Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail
- 2.0.1 Video: Nissan X-Trail - Test Drive
- 2.0.2 Video: Mazda CX-5 2015 - Test Drive
exterior and interior
In favor of Nissan X-Trail, the fact that the Japanese crossover appeared on the market recently. It happened in 2014. It would seem that the X-Trail should not be given a little, but here a keen joke played his design with a car. If the X-TRAIL of the past generation in its appearance did not fully interfere with other models of the Japanese company, then the car is currently produced by the flesh of a real Nissan with all the corporate elements in the outside. Pomo-Mu nothing bad about it, but the trouble is that with a hundred meters X-TRAIL not distinguish from more compact and, accordingly, a little cheaper crossover Nissan Qashqai.. The owners of Qashqai have such similarities only on hand, but those who will acquire an X-Trail for themselves will definitely want, so that their car was endowed at least a droplet of individuality.
But, if you distract from comparison, it will be necessary to recognize what the Nissan X-Trail looks great. Designers made a proposal to potential customers let and not very catchy, but a very solid look. Nissan X-Trail inspires respect.
Crossover Mazda CX-5 began three years before his own visa. But the outdoor of the car was so successful that in addition during the restyling, that Mazda conducted this year, they decided not to change it. Designers were limited to only small strokes, thanks to which motorists will be able to distinguish an updated car from dorestayling assumptions. Instead of a radiator lattice in a small cell, the crossover acquired a "shield" with large straps.
The front bumper has changed little. But in general, the Mazda Crossover CX-5 remained himself. This is the same as before a stylish car, pleases with rapid lines, predatory optics and verified proportions.
The years go, and Mazda CX-5, such a feeling appears, only good.
Yes, and completely does not feel that the Mazda Crossover CX-5 noticed the light in the distance on car standards in 2011. The stylish three-spoke wheel would fully come to the "charged" Mazda 3 MPS, and better than a good combination of devices in three heated "wells" for a long time will not come up with anything. Excellent fit into the interior and a huge color display, which is as if linked to the front panel.
In the same suit here and a minimalistic climate installation control unit. In a word - the interior of Mazda CX-5 is specifically perceived as the super-modern and very relevant.
Internal interior Mazda CX-5
In Nissan X-Trail The mood is second. Self-respecting and once again composure - it seems that designers who worked on the interior of the X-Trail were guided by this motto. The steering wheel with the same three knitting needles as on the Mazda CX-5, it is completely not thought of sports. Yes, and the architecture of the central console itself is a model of automotive classicism. The color display from two sides is surrounded by keys, on it - small deflectors of the totality of ventilation, under it - buttons and "lamb" carrying responsibility for climate control settings. Everything is extremely easy and clear.
And quite expensive. Thanks to high-quality excellent assembly and finishing materials in Nissan X-Trail, a feeling appears that you are in a much more expensive car.
Salon Nissan X-Trail
Does not leave this feeling and on the rear seats. And this is fully natural. Nissan X-Trail is in length about ten centimeters More Mazda CX-5, respectively, and passengers it offers more space. If the high passenger behind the high driver in the Mazda CX-5 will sit without a gap in the knees, then in the X-Trail in the same situation there will still be a tangible supply of free space.
The crossover from Nissan and by the number of trunk - 497 liters vs. 403 liters in Mazda CX-5 are marked. Despite the fact that with folded backs rear seatsAnd it thinks more unusual, the difference is no longer so huge. In Mazda CX-5, the amount of the trunk will be 1560 liters, and in the second Japanese crossover the cargo will be given only 25 liters more.
Hasive and spacious trunk Nissan X-Trail
Characteristics of Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail
When determining the ruler power aggregates For the machines implemented in the domestic market, both Japanese companies were uniquely unique. As if they would consist of two gasoline and one for their own crossovers diesel engine. With Nissan X-Trail, gasoline engines have a number of 2 liters (144 horsepower) and 2.5 liters (171 horsepower), and a diesel "Nissanovsky" unit with an amount of 1.6 liters issues 130 "horses".
With gear shift boxes offered for X-Trail, the following is the following mechanics for diesel crossovers, the 177-strong version is equipped with a variator, and for machines with a basic double-liter engine of cheaps of both types of transmissions.
Mazda has chosen other combinations. The variator on the Mazda Crossover CX-5 is not installed in principle. Instead, the Japanese use the usual automatic box Shift. She works in a pair with any of the three engines offered for CX-5. They are the following - two-liter gasoline power 150 horse power , 192-strong gasoline of 2.5 liters and diesel force aggregatethat with the number of 2.2 liters develops 175 "horses". For the very strong gasoline engine Cheese also mechanical gearbox.
It is she who is installed by default on the basic version of the Japanese crossover. Equally as I. front-wheel drive, What's on this car It looks inappropriate. The benefit that for a small surcharge, the client will still take and plug-in, but four-wheel drive. The same situation and with Nissan X-Trail.
Would you like winter Feeling with confidence - Be kinded the smallest to upset.
Video: Nissan X-Trail - Test Drive
Top gasoline and diesel engines installed on Nissan X-Trail, noticeably not a strong "Mazdovsky" power units. Accordingly, no correct comparison in this case cannot be speech. In equal conditions, Mazda CX-5 will be noticeably dynamic than its own opponent. Despite the fact that both by the power of two-liter engines (the difference in 6 horsepower is unlikely to be considered determining) Mazda CX-5 will still be in the forefront.
If a crossover from Nissan with a variator to accelerate up to a lot of 12.1 seconds is required, then the Mazda CX-5 with a "automatic" will easily collect the cherished hundred in just 9.8 seconds. And it will not catch up. High speed Mazda CX-5 is also higher - 191 km / h against 180 km / h in Nissan X-Trail.
There is already definitely not in six missing "horses", but in aerodynamics.
Video: Mazda CX-5 2015 - Test Drive
But the fact that the two-liter Nissan X-Trail is noticeably augable Mazda CX-5 with the same by the number of engine, it is possible to be fully distributed to various machines. The difference in two hundred kilograms makes itself felt. Just based on this, a relatively heavy Nissan X-Trail will require 9.4 l / 100 km, and the more compact and light Mazda CX-5 will cost 8.2 liters of fuel to each hundred kilometers.
Price tag on both Japanese crossovers is possible and monotonous, but in fact it is completely various cars. The playful and stylish Mazda CX-5 is perfectly suitable for young and active. But the Nissan X-Trail is initially focused on homemade people.
They can easily humble with the fact that they will not succeed in traffic light races, but the X-TRAIL will love for respectable appearance , spacious interior, reliability and comfort.
My question on Mazda CX-5 2.0. Not against if I ask you?
I plan to change the car this year. Tested Kugu, Tiguan, Kaptiva, RAF 4, and CX 5. The latter liked the most ... Requirements: Low cost of content, big ground clearance, Reliability, minimum loss during the sale. H-trail I do not consider because such a version is like me now, costs 1.275ml. And it is already with discounts, moreover, you want new impressions. Initially thought to meet 1 ml. But now I understand that, do not work out .. 1.2 ml. This is for me a maximum .. I wanted to know from the falcon-owners of the owners x Trail, maybe someone rolls Mazda or leans to such a choice, drove a test drive. What impressions have you left-5? ..
My thoughts: good noise insulation, excellent efficiency, acceptable dynamics (2 liters, automatic transmission to Restayl. Now there is a new engine control unit and a box. The dealer says the difference in the dynamics has become very noticeable. I think the dynamics remains the same, just perceived now more nice ), the quality of finishing materials is excellent, the design of the interior of a la BMW, the real road clearance is 195 mm. Inexpensive then. The system of protection against collision in traffic jams is very relevant I think. Here is a comparison with Tiguan and some passport details:
What did not like it: the back of the rear seats is not regulated by the tilt and personally for me the angle of inclination is not comfortable, too vertically. The angle of entry is not enough: unfortunately did not find official data, but in my opinion, much less than H-trail. The trunk is of course less than that of the ICA, but it is sufficient for me. Evidence of adequate work full drive I did not find it on YouTube, I'm afraid that I will not cope with diagonal hanging on the rise .. I will be glad if I am mistaken. Therefore, I seriously consider the monoprifer, you can middle Equipment Buy for 1.075ml. Externally, not a beauty (well, I do not like a big nostril of the radiator grille), although there is nothing at the side and behind anything.
The biggest doubt causes the engine. Declare a record degree of compression 14: 1, more than many sports cars .. However, precisely because of this, an outstanding fuel efficiency is achieved. On the test drive BC showed 10.5 liters / 100km. For comparison of Cuga 1.6 180 l / s 16.5 l / 100km, RAF 4 (New) 2.5 18.5 l / 100km, Tiguan Tdizel 2.0 11.5 liters per hundred. Probably diesel lost due to the fact that longer goes to the operating temperature.)
From here the most important question for knowledgeable people: how can the record degree of compression on the resource of the engine in real exploitation? CX-5 is sold for more than a year, it seems no special complaints.
Pyssyss: all IMHO.
By the way, the cost of insurance at CX-5 is quite acceptable - in Ingos, I counted about 70 thousand for cars worth 1ml.200 thousand. It is interesting that Mazda 3 worth 700 thousand, insure in Ingos for 104 thousand !!!
Dmitry | September 23, 2015, 22:05 |Comparative assessment japanese crossovers
It is always not easy to compare. And it is even more difficult to compare cars, because from the share of subjectivity is not going anywhere, and among cars there is always a "pet", which I want to overestimate the score on the point above the competitors.
Compare 4 Japanese crossover: ,. Acquaintance with cars took place during test trips.
To somehow equalize the chances, we will define the criteria for which we compare cars: exterior / interior, dynamics of acceleration, efficiency / fuel consumption, smoothness and comfort, cost and simplicity of maintenance, hijaciousness / unscrewing, liquidity (the ability to sell a car for adequate price), safety, reliability, car cost.
Estimates for all criteria exhibit on 10 ballest scale.
Exterior / Interior.
From the whole fourth of Japanese crossovers liked the design Mitsubishi Outlander. III, but did not like the presence of a large number of chrome details in it, and the glossy pad front bumper - impractical for operation in russian conditions. Evaluation - 9 points.
New design Nissan X-TRAIL as a whole liked, but feed with "kintim" rear lanterns Not impressed. Evaluation - 8 points.
Mazda CX-5 is a pretty harmonious car, after restyling it began to look better, but in some details everything is not enough of some completeness, in particular the form of wheeled arches. Evaluation - 7 points.
Toyota RAV4 - Subjectively, did not like the design of the design. Evaluation - 5 points.
Dynamics of overclocking.
In my opinion, the Mazda CX-5 is accelerated. And the engine is the most powerful and torque is the largest. Evaluation - 10 points.
Outlander is just riding, no fire in acceleration is not felt. Evaluation - 8 points.
I think that the X-Trail with the 2.5 engine will go about the same way as Outlander, alas on the test was a car with a 2-liter engine. Evaluation - 7 points.
Toyota Rav4 did not like overclocking. According to the dynamics, the worst, the pedal is picking up into the floor, but the engine is only roaring, does not go. Evaluation - 6 points.
Efficiency / Fuel consumption.
During standard test trips, it is difficult to determine how much fuel will consume a car during normal operation. Therefore, we will focus on the characteristics of the manufacturer and the testimony on-board computer car.
The most economical promises to be Mazda CX-5, the consumption declared by the manufacturer is very impressive - 7.3 liters per 100 km. Evaluation - 9 points.
Toyota RAV4 showed a good consumption, just over 8.5 liters per hundred. But the sake of justice it should be noted that the test trip was held on the highway and at a speed of 90 km / h. Evaluation - 8 points.
Nissan X-TRAIL showed 11 liters on a hundred in urban mode. Evaluation - 7 points.
Mitsubishi Outlander showed flow during 13 liters test. Evaluation - 6 points.
Smoothness and comfort.
Really liked the smoothness of the stroke and the work of the Mitsubishi suspension Outlander III.. I looked through a few drives of the drives of this car, which said that Outlander became harsh. It seemed to me that the car became more comfortable compared to the predecessors. The most important thing has improved noise insulation. Evaluation - 10 points.
Approximately the same picture with Nissan X-Trail, journalists say - became hard, I obviously did not notice it. Noise insulation worse than Mitsubishi Outlander III. Evaluation - 9 points.
Mazda CX-5 is harsh, on the big irregularities of "feed" jumbles. Noise isolation worse than Nissan and Mitsubishi. Evaluation - 8 points.
Toyota RAV4 - Hard car, frankly "goat" on irregularities. Noise insulation is not very. Evaluation - 6 points.
Service simplicity and low cost of service.
In connection with the change in the ruble / dollar / euro courses, prices maintenance Japanese crossovers. At the moment it is not noone. Prices for spare parts official dealers There were so tall, and now they have become even higher. You can reduce costs if you look for and purchase spare parts yourself.
Warranty in all crossovers operates for 3 years or 100,000 km of run. But, the interservice interval at Mazda, Nissan, Mitsubishi - 15,000 km or 1 time per year (which will come earlier), and at Toyota - 10,000 km or 1 time per year (which will come earlier).
Thus, if you go through running, then Toyota Service It turns out more expensive. Mazda CX-5, Nissan X-Trail, Mitsubishi Outlander is evaluated - 7 points, Toyota - 6 points.
Safety.
I looked through several videos of crash tests of Japanese crossovers. All have good safety performance. All get 9 points.
Hagonability / Inviability.
The most hijacked in the fourth of Japanese crossovers is Toyota Rav4 and Mitsubishi Outlander. Evaluation - 5 points. Mazda CX-5 is also listed in the list of car hijacked, but not at the first places. Evaluation - 6 points. About the hijaciousness of Nissan X-Trail information is missing. Evaluation - 8 points.
Liquidity / Ability to sell the car at an adequate price.
Toyota loves in our country, so the RAV4 will be sold on the renewer, and sell for adequate money. Evaluation - 10 balls.
I think all other models sell will not be so easy. Therefore, I put the estimates like this: Mitsubishi Outlander III - 8 points, Mazda CX-5 - 7 points, Nissan X-TRAIL - 6 points.
Reliability of the car.
Compared Japanese crossover crossovers, and Japanese cars have always been famous for good reliability. But it is known that making cars are reliable in our time for automakers unprofitable. It is enough for the car to travel a warranty period without problems. Therefore, we break the points like this: Toyota RAV4 - 9 points, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mazda CX-5, Nissan X-Trail - 8 points.
Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5 2017-2018 - new products from manufacturers from Japan.
Almost all parts and characteristics are updated in these machines.
Nissan X-Trail now has new forms and sizes. Now there are no angular angles in appearance, more smooth outlines. The front is slightly stretched. Perfectly appeared updated DRL, front lights - xenon. Aggressive bumper comes forward. Capoty outlines repeat the arches of the wheels. Lovely, the air intake and the grille of the radiator from chromium look like. The hood cover has convex and powerful forms. In the rear, you can consider triangular headlights, a wavy powerful bumper and the fifth door.
In appearance Mazda CX-5 changed the head optics, it is now more compact. The bottom of the radiator lattice is placed element from chromium. The appearance of the car has aerodynamic lines - it can be seen on shifted front racks and more inclined front glass. A small headlights and a large fifth door are visible on the stern.
Interior of Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5
Engineers in Nissan X-Trail The interior decoration has changed completely. Inside the many expensive parts that are made of high-quality materials. Chairs high-quality and decorated leather. The instrument panel has several levels. It is located 5 inches. Screen and multiple control keys. Multiculor has ergonomic shapes. The console in the center is 7 inch. ScriptComputer screen.
As for the internal decoration of Mazda CX-5, then it has updated the instrument panel and console in the center. The instrument panel has a round-shaped device and a sidecomputer color. Console in the center with new climate control deflectors and 7 inches. Touch screen multimedia system. The steering wheel is also slightly changed. Customers can choose several interior design versions and finishing materials.
Video
Start selling in Russia
Both Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5 in our country will be sold in the summer of this year.
Package
Nissan X-Trail:
- XE - Motor 2 l. 144 "mares", gasoline, box - MT, variator, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 11.1 / 11.7 s, speed - 183 km / h, consumption: 11.2 / 6.7 / 8.4; 9 / 6.2 / 7.2
- Motor 2 l. 144 "Mares", gasoline, box - variator, drive on both axes, acceleration - 12.1 s, speed - 180 km / h, consumption: 9.5 / 6.5 / 7.6
- SE, SE + - Motor 2 l. 144 "mares", gasoline, a box - a variator, drive and on the front axle, and on both axes, acceleration - 11.7 / 12.1 s, speed - 183/180 km / h, consumption: 9 / 6.2 / 7.2; 9.5 / 6.5 / 7.6
- Le Urban, Le, Le Urban +, Le + - Motor 2 l. 144 "mares", gasoline, a box - a variator, drive and on the front axle, and on both axes, acceleration - 11.7 / 12.1 s, speed - 183/180 km / h, consumption: 9 / 6.2 / 7.2; 9.5 / 6.5 / 7.6
- Motor 1.6 l. 130 "Mare", DT, Box - MT, Drive on both axles, acceleration - 11 s, Speed \u200b\u200b- 187 km / h, Consumption: 6.2 / 4.8 / 5.4
- Motor 2.5 l. 171 "Horse", gasoline, box - variator, drive on both axles, acceleration - 10.5 s, speed - 191 km / h, consumption: 11.3 / 6.7 / 8.4
Mazda CX-5:
- Drive - Motor 2 l. 150 "horses", gasoline, box - MT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 9.3 s, speed - 197 km / h, consumption: 7.8 / 5.4 / 6.3
- Motor 2 l. 150 "horses", gasoline, box - at, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 8.9 s, speed - 191 km / h, consumption: 7.9 / 5.5 / 6.4
- Active is a 2-liter motor. 150 "horses", gasoline, box - at, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 8.9 s, speed - 191 km / h, consumption: 7.9 / 5.5 / 6.4
- Active + - Motor 2.5 l. 192 "Horses", gasoline, box - at, drive on both axes, acceleration - 7.9c, speed - 194 km / h, consumption: 9.3 / 6.2 / 7.4
- Motor 2 l. 150 "Horses", gasoline, box - at, drive on both axes, acceleration - 9.4 s, speed - 187 km / h, consumption: 8.3 / 6.0 / 6.8
- Supot - Motor 2.5 l. 192 "Horses", gasoline, box - at, drive on both axes, acceleration - 7.9c, speed - 194 km / h, consumption: 9.3 / 6.2 / 7.4
- Motor 2.2 liters. 175 "Horses", DT, Box - AT, Drive on both axes, acceleration - 9.4 s, Speed \u200b\u200b- 204 km / h, Consumption: 7 / 5.4 / 6.0
Gabarits.
- D * w * in Nissan X-Trail - 4640 * 1820 * 1710 mm
- D * w * in Mazda CX-5 - 4545 * 1840 * 1690 mm
- Clien Nissan X-Trail - 210 mm, Mazda CX-5 - 210 mm
Price of all complete sets
Price Nissan X-Trail from 1409000 p. Until 2000000 p. Mazda price CX-5 from 1350000 p. up to 2100000 p.
Engine Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5
Motor gamma Nissan X-Trail consists of 3 power units: 2 liters. 144 "Horses", diesel engine at 1.6 liters. 130 "horses" and 2.5 liters. 171 "Horse". PPC - "Mechanics" and CVT-variator. Refueling and gasoline and diesel. The acceleration time ranges from 11 to 12.1 seconds. Average petrol aggregate "Eats" of fuel about 7.4 liters. Limit speed - 191 km / h.
Motor gamma Mazda CX-5 consists of 2 gasoline installations and one diesel engine.
- Gasoline units: 2-liter 150 "horses" and 2.5 liter on 192 "horses". KPP - "Mechanics" and "Avtomat". The maximum speed with the "automatic" - 187 km / h, with "Mechanics" - 197 km / h.
- And diesel installation by 2.2 liters. 175 "Horses". The box is equipped with only the "automatic", the limit speed is 204 km / h.
Baghtik Nissan X-Trail and Mazda CX-5
The trunk of Nissan X-Trail is designed for 1585 liters. The trunk of Mazda CX-5 is designed for 1980 liters.
Final conclusion
As a result, we found that the equipment of cars is fully updated. Engineers of both companies have improved almost all characteristics. As for the price category, it is acceptable for the described updated cars. Choose from the described.
