It's no secret that in the class "Compact" leadership shares American and European cars. Of course, there was such a period that Koreans tried to intervene in this confrontation, but nothing from the Asian automakers did not work. Today we compare Ford Focus and Skoda Rapid. These companies made the most notable contribution to the aforementioned confrontation. And now we will try to decide which car worthy of more attention.
In 1998, a presentation of a subcompact car was held, which was not different from the concept presented in 1991. Interestingly, the car is considered one of the most popular in Russia. From 1999 to this day, more than 500,000 copies of focus were implemented in the domestic market. In 2002, a restyling of the American model took place, after which the car received an improved design and stuffing. It is worth noting that the level of sales of the updated compact car rose by 50%.
In 2004, a second-generation focus was presented to Universal Review, based on the C1 module. The car is considered a direct relative Volvo S40 and Mazda 3, as it shares one platform with them. In 2008, the updated version of the American version was presented in Frankfurt. Among the most significant changes should be allocated to the modernization of the security system.
In 2010, the focus on Detroit debuted 3, who also survived a large-scale restyling in 2014. According to representatives of the company, next year, the output of the fourth generation should take place.
The main competitor "American" - Skoda Rapid, was presented at the Frankfurt Motor Show in 2011. To be more precise, the concept car model presented in Germany, and the final version of Rapid debuted in the fall of 2012 in Paris. In 2013, the Czech model began in the domestic factory in Kaluga. It is worth noting that the Russian version of Rapid has an adapted suspension and a higher road clearance.
Four configurations of the car are available in Russia. Plus, in 2012, Rapid was recognized as the safest in the segment. At the moment, the rodded version of the Czech car is also available on the world market - Seat Toledo.
What is better in terms of the success of a career? The advantage I want to give "American" Ford Focus.
Appearance
Comparing the exterior of the car you can see one rather rare and from the even more interesting pattern: an externally design of the car absorbed the mentality and traditions of the country of the manufacturer. Explain: in the exterior focus you can see the inherent flares and focus. Designers were able to combine progressiveness and traditionalism inherent in the entire model of Ford.
His opponent looks outwardly looks quite a typical European car, the exterior of which is made according to the concept of conservatism and practicality, but it is not deprived of taste and sophistication.
Despite this difference, the front part of the car has a very similar layout of the elements, but here the advantage I want to give exactly the Ford Focus.
But on the side and behind the cars are absolutely different, which is already more consistent with the expectations of motorists. For more bold design decisions, the local victory is awarded "American".
Considering the foregoing, Ford Focus looks stronger than its competitor in terms of appearance.
Hatchback and station wagon
Cars are also available in other bodies. Ford Focus in the body of hatchback and wagon, rapid, in addition to the sedan, in Combi.
Salon
Comparing car salons, I want to note that they are made in very similar stylistic concepts, but, nevertheless, the inner decoration focus is prettier. This is due to the perfect combination of the Americans salon of the main features of the model range and the latest technological developments of the company. In turn, Rapid can offer a very boring and familiar interior. Of course, it cannot be called very weak, but in this opposition it is noticeably inferior.
The only consolation for Czech developers was the fact that the interior of their car is suitable for the opponent. But it concerns the quality of the finish, here, again, the explicit favorite Ford Focus.
Specifications
For the maximum comparison, we opposed two 1.6-liter modifications of focus and rapid, each of which was collected in 2017.
So, the Rapid Body is longer than 123 mm focus, but at the same time below 31 mm. The size of the wheelbase is also more american car - 2648 mm against 2602 mm. But the clearance is higher at the "Cecha" - 170 mm versus 167 mm. In addition, Skoda Rapid is easier than its opponent by 159 kg. Here, we note that Rapid has a more voluminous luggage compartment - 530 liters, against 316 liters in focus.
As for the power units, they both work on gasoline, and are connected to the full drive system. Despite the same volume, the power of the engines is different. Rapid engine issues 110 horse power, and focus - 125 "horses". Such a difference is explained quite simply - the motor of the American car is equipped with a turbine supercharger.
If we talk about the dynamic indicators, then, for example, the time of acceleration from zero to hundreds of rapid - 11.6 s, and its today's competitor - 11.7 p. Also, the Czech model boasts - 6.1 liters on average, against 6.3 liters in focus.
Price
After analyzing the realities russian marketIt was possible to find out that the average cost is 725,000 rubles. His American Visavi will cost about 960 thousand rubles. A relatively high cost focus of 2017 release is explained by the fact that the Americans have always been suggested to overestimate the price of their products.
It is known that everyone is inclined to choose their own, it is unique preferences for appearance, for purpose, etc. caused a huge variety of cars. However, not everyone is building plans to buy a car based only on visual satisfactory design, characteristic, equipment, so much more plays a paramount role. The extraction of the car becomes the similar engine of 1.6 liters, but a comparative overview of the machines should be carried out and determine the main advantages and cons of each option.
Assembly
If we take into account the place of assembling the car for our region, then there is no fundamental difference, since the production of both TS is in Russia. So Skoda Rapid comes from Kaluga, and Kia Rio is manufactured in St. Petersburg.
Body type
It starts interesting, if you look at the lineup Kia, then the Rio model is sold in the hatchback case or sedan, that is, you have to choose between them. Rapid also has common visual features taken from both types, so it combines a sedan with the hatchback. Such a body is called Liftback, a fairly unique design and awareness is provided, well, as far as they are functional, to choose each owner yourself.
Exterior
Some differences in external design and size are observed in both cars, but the unambiguous advantages of any side to give it difficult, rather a taste. Czech auto industry has created a model with strictly underlined broken lines, it should be visually noted by the similarity with Octavia, even not everyone can distinguish them immediately. The Korean auto industry has characteristic features of Asian design, it is traditional enough, but there are some elements of European trends. The design is based on a calm shape, with smooth lines, generally creates a diplocity. Trends promise and further distribute this direction.
Trunk and capacity
The choice between these cars in terms of capacity can be made with a naked eye. If you look at Skoda, then there is a big trunk, its capacity reaches 550 liters and this is subject to the presence of rear backs. Useful volume increases greatly, if they are omitted, then you can accommodate 1500 liters. By paying attention not to the exhibit of the Korean manufacturer, there is a 389 liter trunk, which is 30% less competitor. The documentation does not indicate the volume when the backs lowered, but it is obvious that it will be less.
If you compare the dimensions inside the car, then there is no significant difference in first glance. Nevertheless, reviews of high growth owners are uniquely preferential choice in favor of Rapid because of the convenient location of the steering wheel and pedals when the steering wheel does not interfere with the pedal. Kia Rio does not provide such comfort, you will have to choose between the convenience of pressing the accelerator or control.
Czech car body is somewhat wider, which allows you to get the driver more space in the shoulders. In appearance The interior of Korean has a significant contribution to the front panel. It is made of high-quality plastic, while it is trimmed by leatherette, the appearance is created by the impression of the high-cost model. Skoda stuck on plastic, it is not too pleasant to the touch, the impression of using mediocre, a cheap series of material is immediately noticeable. At the same time, the panel is collected several sludge, which creates a small roe when used.
Interior
The shield with devices is more attractive, bright and rich in KIA, which is immediately striking. Made by the design of SuperVision with red backlight, which looks spectacular, expensive and aggressively. Skoda went on the opposite path, instead of beauty, preference is given to informativeness and ease of understanding of the instruments. Readability of a high-level panel with any lighting, but the appearance is less spectacular.
Going to the rear seats is a slightly greater space from Skoda, it is extremely important when placing tall passengers. More spaciously in Skoda Rapid 2016, but there is no big discomfort from both competitors. Compared to KIA, the angle of inclination at the back is somewhat larger, because of this, more load from the back of the passenger is transmitted to the seat and notes best level facilities. Also from behind in Skoda there are lamps, several cup holders, on the ceiling usual handles, pockets are present in the doorway. For korean car Made a single lamp and a cupboard, and there are no pockets at all, another little drawback - glass on the door is not completely lowered. As opposed to the disadvantages of Kia seats are trimmed with material prone to self-cleaning. Also in the car, when transporting 3 passengers from behind, more amenities, as there is no tunnel in the center.
Equipment
Immediately note that more technologically advanced is Kia Rio. The car has cast discs, a large number of airbags are built-in (6 pcs.). You can enjoy climate control, the audio system has a pleasant, clean sound. Embedded fog lightsAnd for glass there is a luxury - electric heating. To obtain these same characteristics in Skoda, we should overpay and buy a more expensive complete set. Standard includes 2 pillows, wheels are in a stamped disk.
Clearance. This indicator is approximately the same, in appearance virtually no difference. Technical documentation reports to Skoda suspension and its clearance - 143 mm, and a Korean competitor - 160 mm.
Technical comparison
Acceleration and maximum speed. It is difficult to consider this parameter when choosing a car, since the dynamic component is approximately identical, and the values \u200b\u200bare extremely close. So for the mechanical gearbox, the comparison of SKODA and KIA is 10.6 and 10.3, if we take into account the automatic gearbox, the gap is also minimal, 11.9 and 11.2. The most developed speed - both cars confidently hold at a speed of 190 km / h. The volume of the engine in both machines is the same - 1.6 liters. Thus, both transports are fast enough, dynamic and perfectly suitable for the city, but a small plus is still in favor of Skoda.
Fuel consumption. Cars in this regard are practically similar, so can be compared as follows:
As can be seen from the table, approximately gasoline is spent equally, but somewhat smaller consumption is observed in KIA, although both cars can be called economical.
Volume of fuel tank. The difference in capacity is essential, it especially plays a role in distant travel. Skoda has a capacity of 55 liters with a capacity of 55 liters, in KIA they were somewhat stuck and installed only 43 liters.
Transmission. The choice should be done individually, as there are various models CAT depending on the configuration, but the variety of choice is definitely more at Kia Rio. The technology used in KIA emphasizes the reliability of the hydromechanical device, which is much better than that of the "Europeans", which works on the basis of a DSG robot, which has deserved a bad reputation in the world. So car Kia. Sold in five and six speed options mechanical typeThe machine is supplied in four and six speed models. A slightly longer choice of Skoda, where only the five-speed mechanical gearbox and a six-speed automation.
Power
The advantage in this section should be given KIA, which is 18 horsepower ahead of the opponent. So Skoda has 105 hp, what 128 hp answers KIA
Chassis
The championship is definitely at the Korean option, as it is much more convenient to manage, because the motion is smooth, in turns to enter it is not difficult in a calm pace. If you turn at a sharp angle, it does not roll. Skoda, in turn, much straightforward, maneuverability can not be enough. Even the type of overclocking is different, Kia is characterized by smoothness, compact, some linearity, which is more reliable than Skoda. Skoda on the contrary produces acceleration sharply, cuttingly, which creates an impression of aggressiveness.
Test Drive
Of course, to identify Skoda Rapid or Kia Rio that it is better impossible without detecting the behavior of cars in real operating conditions. Hanging comparative Test Drive Additional features of machines surfaced.
Noise insulation of good quality in both options for cars, there is no significant consumption in qualitative indicators. Nevertheless, the maintenance of the dialogue on calm colors may not work. Already stipulated that the power in KIA is higher, but in real conditions it did not become noticeable, acceleration was made approximately over an equal time, although the behavior is different. Korean has a pleasant, easy gas pedal, if there is an automatic gearbox, the selection of the necessary transmission is performed faster. Tests revealed that for Skoda it is necessary to create a greater pressure on the accelerator to impart maximum speed. The operation of the automatic transmission on the Europeans is somewhat worse, since the reduction in the speed leads to a slight delay when switching transmissions is eliminated in sports mode.
Kia Rio is a bit more complicated in control over a smoother trajectory, as it is difficult to determine a clear zero from which the angle of rotation is counting. So korean car Several limits the unity with the driver, they will have to feel some discomfort, perhaps almost imperceptible.
Conclusion
Kia wins the configuration, but Skoda better Suitable as a family car, with greater capacity. However, a significant plus toward the "Korean", since the cost is less, in terms of crisis, people prefer this factor. What to choose, preferences regarding design, prices, functional, power, etc. It should be determined independently, since both options are worthy competitors.
Video Compare Rapid with Rio
Rapid, and whether he is his money?
Collars very detailed about rapid
And now the opinion of Vononikova about Rio
Large test drive tells about Kia Rio
Market domestic cars Replenished the most anticipated brainchild of AvtoVAZ - Sedan "Lada Vesta", which is considered today the main applicant for sales leadership in the budget segment.
The real competitor "Vesta" can be the "Skoda Rapid", a comparison with which will help the motorist to make a purchase in accordance with its preferences.
In the review Lada Vesta. vs. Skoda Rapid Consider and compare these two cars for the following criteria:
- exterior;
- salon;
- separate negative nuances of constructive solutions;
- specifications and comparison of engines.
Exterior
Compare the exterior of Lada Vesta cars and Skoda Rapid in an angle, which is better, it is impossible, since the design solutions of these machines are based on different concepts.
In Lada Vesta lines, there is a dynamism undergoing smooth body elements with original solutions and samples of previously used designers, in particular, X-design - avant-garde application of applications in the design of crossed lines and elements resembling the Latin letter "X".
In the exterior of Skoda Rapid, European conservatism prevails with traditional rigorous lines and straight pairs, which only at first glance does not pretend to be sore. But in the classics of the Rapid exterior there are modern design elements that endow the body of some sportingity - the execution of optional wheels and front bumper With a lattice insert.
When comparing Vesta and Rapid exterior, the criteria of practicality and functionality are absent, so the choice is based on the individual taste of the buyer.
Gabarits.
Vesta shorter Rapid, but surpasses it for the rest of the parameters - it is wider and above Rapid, and also has a greater wheelbase. At the same time, the road clearance of Vesta is 1 mm more clearance rapid, which is already high enough, taking into account the climatic conditions and characteristic shortcomings of Russian roads.
For the sake of objectivity, it should be noted that the length and width of both cars ensure the ease of maneuvering and rebuilding when moving in the stream of machines, as well as the convenience of parking in cramped conditions.
You can analyze the dimensions of these cars in more detail on tabular data.
Salon
The second largest parameter after the body exterior when choosing a car is a design, functionality and comfort of the cabin.
Comparison of the design of the salons gives a picture identical to the estimation of exteriors - the interior of Skoda Rapid salon, including the front panel architecture, is made in a straightforward style of European classics.
The design of the Lada Vesta salon is more futuristic - the sports panel of the instruments, the use of combinations of smooth lines and the regiments make its architecture more complicated, exquisite.
Therefore, the criterion in this issue when choosing a car is the taste and preferences of the motorist.
Air conditioning
All "Lada Vesti", except for the model with basic a complete set of Lada Vesta Classic, equipped with air conditioning or climate control. Even in the car standing on a 50 degree sun, a regular air conditioner with competent configuration with its duties copes excellent, so in optimizing the air conditioning system Lada Vesta there is no need.
Fuel consumption When the air conditioner is enabled, it increases by 10-15%, and therefore, when driving with a trailer or in highlands, an automatic shutdown of the air conditioning system is provided. If you have climate control, switching the system from the cooling mode to the heating mode is performed manually on the control panel located on the center console opposite the gear lever. Under the front seats "Lada Vesta" there are air ducts for heating feet of seating from behind passengers.
Skoda Rapid is equipped with a regular air conditioning in the Ambition model. There is no air conditioning in the STYLE modification, and it is installed in ENTRY and Active for an additional fee.
Fuel consumption When the air conditioner is turned on, approximately the same value as the "Vesti", but the automatic shutdown of the unit during the movement of the vehicle under load is not provided, which indicates that it says that it is smaller. At the same time, the operation of the air conditioner at Skoda Rapid is accompanied by an unusual specific noise caused by a feature of the coupling drive. Climate control at Skoda Rapid is present in the Style modification and in the option package - in AMBITION.
Noise insulation
The noise level in the salons "Lada Vesta" and "Skoda Rapid", even corresponds to the class of cars, but differs in magnitude. On Lada Vesta, as in many foreign production machines, felt shoes, protecting the arches from the road "sandblasting", and the salon is from noise.
Such a material absorbs water, but does not accumulate it - the water flocks quickly, and the porous felt ensures dry surface of the arches by accessing air and its circulation.
Skoda Rapid's Arch Protection is provided by plastic hinges - the source of noise from the flying from the wheels of the rubble, and in models with the engine volume of 1.6 at a speed above 90 km / h, there is also no disproportionate increase in noise in the cabin, caused by the arrangement of the exhaust manifold and catalyst.
In this regard, the production of additional noise insulation of the wheel arches and the SKODA engine compartment is fully justified.
Stekla
The quality of the glass, both windy and side with the rear, Lada and Skoda of the models under consideration equally leave to be desired. A few months after the start of operation on the front windows in the areas of janitor, arcuate abrasive bands appear, and on the side - traces from the lifting and lowering and contact car wash.
Even small rubble in front of the wheel in front of the running transport is fraught with the appearance of chips requiring repair. Perfect for a long time, take into account the presence of these factors to extend the service life is unreal, therefore it remains only to expect to increase their quality by manufacturers.
Separate negative nuances of constructive solutions
In addition to sufficient number positive characteristicsBoth cars have negative moments.
For Skoda Rapid, this is:
- the doorway of the front doors is small (inconvenience of landing);
- the armrest of the driver's chair makes it difficult to access the hand brake lever;
- small accelerator pedal stroke (less than 5 cm);
- the upholstery of the ceiling is fixed enough, and the height of the ceiling over the passenger near the seats is small (inconvenience for the increasing passengers);
- the angle of the rear window is great (the sun's rays warm the back);
- significant width rear rates (impairment of the review);
- fog lights are not recessed into the bumper (increased optics vulnerability);
- the lack of constipation on the luch of the gas tank.
For "Lada Vesta":
- very rigid plastic front panel;
- the brake and gas pedals Even on version with automatic transmission are located very close from each other (when you press one pedal, the second) is ignited;
- the unsuccessful location of the driver's armrest interferes with fastening the seat belt;
- the rear door glasses are not completely lowered;
- unsuccessful architecture of the instrument panel (part of the instrument readings is issued in small font or not viewed in niche);
- the size of the wheels in 16 inches does not correspond to the status of the "budget" car;
- the unsuccessful design of the hood lock (out of the hole for fixing on the motor flies dirt).
Engines
Consider installed on the "Lada Vesta" and "Skoda Rapid" engines, highlight the most attractive power units and compare their capabilities.
To date, Lada Vesta is completed with four motors. Three of them are developed by domestic producers, and the top engine is supplied by Alliance Renault Nissan. The VAZ engine 21179 was installed at the beginning on the hatchback Lada Xray., and from the fall of 2016. They became equipped with Lada Vesta.
To compare the characteristics, we will reduce the data of these aggregates in the table.
|
Engine |
Number of cylinders valves |
Power |
Twist | Consumption mountains / Tras. (l per 100 km) |
Resource | ||
| VAZ 21116. | 1,6 | 4/8 | 87 | 140/3800 | AI-95 | 8,5/5,7 | 200 |
| 106,
available |
|||||||
| HR16DE-H4M. | 1,6 | 4/8 | 114 | 153/4400 | AI-92, AI-95 | 8,2/5,4 | 250 |
| VAZ 21179. | 1,8 | 4/16 | 122 | 170/3750 | AI-95 | 10,0/6,7 | 300 |
HR16DE-H4M engines and VAZ 21179 are highlighted by its power and resource.
Tuning Motor VAZ 21129 allows you to bring its power up to 150 liters. p., But this improvement will inevitably affect the resource of the motor.
The tops of the presented series undoubtedly is the engine of Nissan HR16DE-H4M, characterized by increased reliability, efficiency, excellent dynamics, the possibility of using two gasoline brands and, moreover, installation fuel system To use methane.
Skoda Rapid for the European market is equipped for today six types of engines, of which the following aggregates are offered for the Russian consumer:
- 6 MPI (90 and 110 l. P.);
- 4 TSI.
Motor 1.6 MPI due to different settings by the software control manufacturer is available in two versions that do not differ in constructively, but with different power values.
Consider the characteristics of these motors, reduced to the table.
Based on the above characteristics and taking into account the reviews of car owners, it can be argued that the HR16DE-H4M engine, installed on "Lada Vesta," exceeds its competitors on both cars, despite the fact that Vesta accelerates as much as possible to a speed of 187 km / h, and "Skoda Rapid" - up to 200. It is caused by a greater reliability and the economy of the top French DVS "Lada Vesta".
Lada VS Skoda Review shows that the considered models of the budget row of the car fully correspond to most of the requirements of the owners, and the available flaws are not so critical to make categorical negative conclusions. As for preference when choosing, it will largely depend on the taste and requirements of the buyer, the disadvantages in some direction with interest are compensated in these models with numerous advantages.
And it should be immediately noted that "Czech", the starting price tag of which was recorded at 4,479,000 rubles, turned out to be more expensive than most competitors, but even promotional Volkswagen Polo Sedan.. How potential customers will be treated for this yet, but do not forget that the novelty is somewhat larger than the "German", and that the additional five centimeters of the wheelbase obviously affected the reserve of space in the legs of the rear passengers, and the 10-centimeter difference in total length - more and on the volume of the cargo compartment (550 liters in the par and 1490 after the transformation). In addition, we will repeat that Skoda is not a sedan, but a liftback, so backdoor It rises with glass, facilitating access to the trunk.
In other words, Skoda to the B-class refers quite conditionally. It even falls out of the segment in +, but the explanation of this is quite trite: the machine platform is a composite, consisting of anterior module borrowed from Fabia, and the rear, taken from Octavia. Another thing is that the engines on Rapid stand are low. The most serious of them develops 122 hp At 200 nm of traction, a ruler begins with a 1,2-liter unit issuing 75 hp. and 112 nm of torque.
However, the main demand will have to cars with 105-strong MPIs - what stands on the already mentioned three-volume POLO. The minimum cost of this version will be 529,000 rubles. The sixdiaband "automatic" will cost another 50,000 rubles. Moreover, in the database, such five modes will be equipped with a single airbag, ABS, front windows and wiring for the installation of audio components. In them, even the drives of the side mirrors will not appear ...
As for the more more than the running equipment, then the minimum set for a comfortable life can only be said in the case when the price tag of the car over 600 thousand. Honor! Competitors, for the most part, let it be more compact, but more affordable. Turn to them.
Hyundai Solaris: from 467 900 rubles
"Korean" who came to replace the once popular accent, overnight became the bestseller of the Russian market and is now the second most popular car in Russia, passing forward only "People's" Lada Granta.. Moreover, the machine always accompanied the car. Even despite the fact that engineers had to process rear suspension. Yes, and the crisis, as practice has shown, Solaris survived relatively well, in any case, since February, the demand for it hangs between zero and small, but plus. Against the background of the falling market, it is very good.
Cars B + with rare exceptions are available with gasoline engines, and Solaris is no exception. He can stand one of the two power units with a volume of 1.4 and 1.6 liters under the hood. Their power is 107 and 123 hp Accordingly, they work in a pair with a five-speed "mechanics" or a four-sample "machine". But the main thing, not bad, hyundai today can be purchased for 500-550 thousand rubles.
Kia Rio: from 499,900 rubles
By and large, Rio is the same Solaris. Kia is somewhat lagging behind the promotional sedan, but on the basis of sales for the first three months of this year, it holds the third line in the ranking of the most sought-after cars of the domestic car market. On the other hand, on such a distribution of Koreans places and calculated.
The fact is that Rio is somewhat more expensive. In addition, there is a slightly different approach to the formation of complete sets. They are richer, so for variations in good performance you have to give 600 thousand rubles. But in the list of equipment, you can find heated steering wheel and some other options intended for the comfortable operation of the car in the frost. Do not forget that the sedan is quite aggressive, which in this segment is still quite rare.
Volkswagen Polo Sedan: from 473 900 rubles
The four-door designed specifically for the Russian market could not hold Korean competitors. He did not help with a strict and concise appearance, nor German technologies, nor a brand nor a relatively decent price tag. Now, however, it is trading at the level of "slightly above average." The price tag decently equipped version is 600,000 rubles.
The car is offered with a non-alternative old atmospheric with a working volume of 1.6 liters and a capacity of 105 hp. It works in a pair with a five-speed "mechanics" or a sixdiaband "automatic". So Rapid will offer customers a richer choice. However, this option will obviously become the most chassis and Skoda.
Nissan Almera.: from 459,000 rubles
By and large, the direct and closest competitor Rapid is Nissan Almera. Created from Logan a little larger than Skoda and offers a much more interesting set of standard equipment. And for less money.
The top-end set of "quadses" with "machine", navigation and Bluetooth wireless protocol is estimated at 586,000 rubles. In addition, Almer is characterized by an omnivorous suspension, an extremely spacious trunk volume (500 liters) and a rather vigorous 102-strong engine with a working volume of 1.6 liters. Here, the appearance pumped up, but taking into account the sales results, you pay attention to the Moscow Ring Road in the most extreme case.
Peugeot 301: from 461,900 rubles
The French rushed into a budget segment later. And they turned out to be interested in the buyer in principle and nothing. The only strong side is honed driving properties. But on this point, potential buyers rarely bet. They are much more concerned about the fact that Peugeot is offered with a fairly dead 75-strong engine, moreover, they are asking for it almost as much as competitors are equipped with 100-strong motors. It does not cause confidence and five-stage "robot" with one clutch.
Unlike all the rivals listed by us, the 301th (as well as the Citroen C-ELYSEE approximately) is imported to Russia. As a result, the price of the car in good configuration will noticeably crawl for 600,000 rubles. This could be completed on this, but still there is a significant trump card - the presence of 92-strong diesel version On the "handle" for 687,900 rubles. Fuel consumption in the mixed cycle of such peugeot is only 4.1 liters.
Large quantities that are simultaneously direct competitors, no one will not surprise anyone. However, no matter how much in common between neighbors in the conveyor - Volkswagen Polo and, they also have a lot of differences. Leave for the scene different types Body, difference in the capacity of the trunk and the cabin. And focus on the equipment: what exactly is in them and how many buyers will have to lay out for this or that version?
Consider four options: basic cars, average equipment with a machine gun and a minimum set of options, special versions Life and Monte Carlo in POLO and RAPID, respectively. And for a snack - the most powerful and expensive versions with a turbo engine and a DSG robot.
Basic versions
The cheapest Skoda Rapid Lifbec in Entry equipment will cost 604,000 rubles. Under the hood, such a car will have a modest 90-strong engine with a working volume of 1.6 liters and a 5-speed mechanic. In such a car there is no smooth account. Neither audio system, nor air conditioner. Saved even on the same rear headrest (central) and rear windows. Such Rapid will find application only in taxi. However, even taxi drivers try to give preference to a more equipped version of ACTIVE, for which the same air conditioning is available at least as an option.
In the initial execution, ConceptLine also does not shine with equipping. Under the hood, the same atmospheric MPI with a capacity of 90 hp But the polo has at least the rear power windows. However, given the same value, Rapid is still preferable. After all, it offers more space for rear passengers and baggage.
At the same time, in a slightly more expensive versions, the scale of the scales is inclined already in favor of POLO. Trendline execution on forty thousand more expensive and supplemented with air conditioning. And if you add 19 000 rubles, then you will receive an audio system, heating the exterior mirrors and windshield. The next execution of rapid - ACTIVE will cost 660,000 blood. And for the packages of options with air conditioning, audio system and heating, mirrors and seats will have to give another 50 thousand.
| Skoda Rapid | Volkswagen Polo. |
|
| Cost | 604 000 rub. | 599 900 rubles. |
| Engine | 1.6 MPI (90 hp) | 1.6 MPI (90 hp) |
| Transmission | ||
| Air conditioning | ||
| Audio system | ||
| Electric windows | Only front | |
| Heating front seats | ||
| Heated windshield | ||
| Heated side mirrors | ||
| Front fog lights |
Middle configuration with automatic
Consider the most running versions on the market - configuration with medium equipment, just over powerful engine and automatic. Skoda Rapid AMBITION with a 110-strong motor and 6-speed automata will cost 864,000 rubles. At the disposal of the buyer of this version will be air conditioning, "dual sniff" audio system Swing, heating the front seats and mirrors, as well as fog lights. However, the Polo sedan with a similar engine and machine gun is also equipped, and it costs almost 100 thousand rubles less. If you throw another 20,000 rubles, then you can count on one-room climate control and heated windshield. So here the Polo is much more attractive - surcharge at 100 thousand for a more roomy interior and the trunk is Velik.
| Skoda Rapid | Volkswagen Polo. |
|
| Cost | 864,000 rubles. | 769 900 rub. |
| Engine | 1.6 MPI (110 hp) | 1.6 MPI (110 hp) |
| Transmission | ||
| Air conditioning | ||
| Audio system | ||
| Bluetooth for connecting mobile devices | ||
| Front and rear power windows | ||
| Heating front seats | ||
| Heated windshield | ||
| Heated side mirrors | ||
| Front fog lights | there is |
Special versions of Life and Monte Carlo
Consider the special series. Rapid is a version of Monte Carlo, which is available with all engines and gearboxes. With a 90-strong RAPID motor dedicated to the famous rally, will cost 847,000 rubles. Much. But bi-xenon headlights, sports steering wheel and sports seats with developed side support, hip support and integrated head restraints will be a distinctive feature of such a car. Outside the Rapid Monte Carlo is easy to calculate over bumpers and thresholds, spoilers on the trunk lid and 16-inch wheels. If you need a 110-strong engine with a machine gun, you will have to give 950,000 rubles.
The Life version of Volkswagen Polo looks simpler and is not distinguished by sport seats, steering or alloy disks. But the price tag is different. Polo performed by LIFE is available only with atmospheric motors. And for a 90-strong car you need to give 669,900 rubles. And for - 754 900. What is even cheaper by ComfortLine, although the list of equipment is at least not worse. In Life to all, there is a leather multicoral, central armrest and other small joys like an advanced R230 audio system. So the special version of POLO is an excellent alternative to the standard Comfotline, while Monte Carlo from Skoda is more suitable for those who want to stand out, and not save.
| Skoda Rapid Monte Carlo | Volkswagen Polo Life. |
|
| Cost | 950 000 rub. | 754 900 rubles. |
| Engine | 1.6 MPI (110 hp) | 1.6 MPI (110 hp) |
| Transmission | ||
| Air conditioning | ||
| Sport seats and steering wheel | ||
| Type of multimedia system | 6 speakers | |
| Heating front seats | ||
| Heated windshield | ||
| Alloy wheels | ||
| Bixenon headlights |
Charged versions
Until last year, Rapid had a version with a turbo engine while POLO did not have a modification of GT all with the same 1.4 TSI and 7-speed DSG. The turbated Skoda performed by Style pulls on the same 950 thousand rubles as the Monte Carlo version with an atmospheric. Sports seats or steering wheel from "Style" no, like bi-xenon headlights. But there is cruise control and one-room climate control.
The basic equipment of POLO GT is modest. Such a car costs nearly 900 thousand. For this money, you can count on 16-inch wheels, climate control, RCD 230 C audio system with four dynamics and heated front seats. If you retain polo missing in comparison with Skoda options, the price will rise by another 20 thousand. So Volkswagen will still be a little cheaper.
| Skoda Rapid Style | Volkswagen Polo Gt. |
|
| Cost | 950 000 rub. | 894 900 rubles. |
| Engine | 1.4 TSI (125 hp) | 1.4 TSI (125 hp) |
| Transmission | ||
| Heated windshield | ||
| Climate control | ||
| Multifunctional steering wheel | ||
| Audio system | Swing - MP3, USB, AUX, SD, Bluetooth.6 speakers | RCD 230 - MP3, USB, SD, AUX, Bluetooth, 4 Dynamics |
| Heating front seats | ||
| Alloy wheels | There are 15 inches | There are 16: |
| Parking sensors | ||
| Bixenon headlights | ||
| Cruise control |
If you compare Skoda Rapid and Volkswagen Polo, then the representative of the Czech brand pleases with a large lounge and a huge trunk. However, the fee for it is high - if not counting the basic versions. In the other cases, the equipped rapid is more expensive than polo, fifty thousand rubles. So it is not surprising that Volkswagen Polo is noticeably more popular with a relative. And those who are a spaciousness of the rear row and the size of the trunk Skoda Rapid or Volkswagen Polo - SG helps to make a choice
Photo: Alexander Vinogradov and manufacturers
