The crisis hit not only the automotive market, but also the tire market. Sales volumes are falling, and drivers are increasingly abandoning expensive premium brand tires in favor of a "second line", especially when it comes to rim diameters of 14, 15 or 16 inches. So we compared the relatively affordable summer tires of size 185/65 R15, and the car was chosen not from the expensive ones - Hyundai Solaris.

We collected tires for this test in the early fall of 2015 - and we were not sure that in six months all the models would remain on our market. However, the ruble has collapsed, but, apparently, not enough to exclude suppliers of imported tires from the game. As for tires produced in Russia, their export has noticeably increased, and in deliveries to domestic market the share of “second line” brands increased. Not Nokian, but Nordman, not Continental, but Matador, not Pirelli, but Formula. Here we have a "second line" represented by models Nokian nordman SX, Tigar sigura, Formula Energy and Matador MP 44 Elite 3, the Cordiant Road Runner tires developed in Russia, as well as the Chinese Headway and GT tires, are included in this subgroup. Radial Champiro Eco. It is curious that the Chinese promise outstanding comfort and safety, and the GTRadial tires even trump with stickers, convincing that the tires are tested in accordance with the classification adopted in the European Union countries for rolling resistance and grip on wet asphalt, and their class is higher than that of tire Matador.Oh?

Measuring complex Racelogic allows you to accurately determine the distance traveled and its time derivatives - speed and acceleration.

But we did not limit ourselves to the "second line"! Among the competitors are Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, Hankook Kinergy Eco K425, Nokian Hakka Green 2 and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance tires. The choice of these particular models was also dictated by the fact that prices for them are slightly higher than for tires of the "second line".

This time, the tests were carried out at the Nokian Tires summer training ground near the Finnish town - what a coincidence! - Nokia.

This polygon is small. Here, for example, there is no ring track for evaluating "high-speed" handling - and if we tested the tires of the UltraHighPerformance (UHP) class, we would probably find another place. But to assess consumer properties related to safety and comfort, there is everything you need here.

We start with the main thing - and take all tires to "clean water", that is, to a wet surface.

When changing wheels, a difference in tire weight is felt: the lightest Nokian and Goodyear (weigh seven kg), the heaviest are Chinese tires and domestic Cordiant tires (8.1 kg).

Braking from a speed of 80 km / h. Six to eight measurements with each set of tires - and the first surprise. The last line of the protocol is occupied by Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 tires, which we formally referred to the "first line". Chinese tires are better! The leaders were Matador, Hankook and Nokian, which allowed the car to stop after less than 30 meters.

Now the task is the opposite: not to slow down, but to accelerate. There is a half-centimeter layer of water under the wheels. The car enters a special bathtub at a speed of 75 km / h, third gear, throttle to the floor, Solaris gains about 80 km / h - and the front drive wheels lose contact with the road: aquaplaning! This dangerous phenomenon is most often encountered when driving through deep puddles or getting into a track rolled in the asphalt. However, on some tires, aquaplaning occurs at a higher speed (Cordiant, Hankook, Nokian and Chinese Headways), while on others it is much earlier: Bridgestone or Formula tires allow you to accelerate only up to 73 km / h, and then "swim freestyle", that is uncontrollable movement until the speed drops or the puddle becomes smaller.

To assess the resistance to aquaplaning, a bathtub is used, filled with a half-centimeter layer of water. After each drive there is a mandatory pause so that the water supply system has time to "return" tens of liters of splashed water

It is not out of place to remind you how to act in such a situation. The main thing: do not panic and do not try to make sharp maneuvers - even if the car is carrying an obstacle! Strongly inverted front wheels, having gained traction, will throw the car to the side with such force that you will not have time to yell as you find yourself in a ditch or on an oncoming lane. It is best to slow down - and prepare for maneuvers if necessary. After all, the rear wheels go on a "drier" track, so the car will slow down in any case. But it is better, of course, not to get into such situations - and to settle in front of puddles in advance (also because a deep hole can be found under the water). And on highways it is worth keeping out of the rut. And along the way, do not spoil the karma, pouring over the neighbors along the stream like from a cannon.

In the EU, all tires are now sold with these stickers: the lettering gives an indication of the tire rolling resistance and braking performance on wet asphalt, as well as the noise level. But here's the problem: the classes (from the highest A to the lowest G) are declared by the manufacturers themselves, and in practice the marking does not always correspond to reality.

Now controllability. Of course, nowadays many problems are solved by the stabilization system, but it also works within the framework of the laws of physics. This means that the friction force in the contact patch of the tire with the road depends on the vertical load and the coefficient of friction. It is the tire developers who are struggling to increase this coefficient. Judging by the results of the races on the compact handling track, the specialists from Nokian and Hankook have done well here. Hankook and Nokian would have earned the same high marks if the stabilization system was activated, but with the system turned off (Solaris allows you to do this) subtle nuances can be revealed. For example, the slip on Nokian tires is more stretched and the car's responses are not as accurate. So the subjective assessment for the reliability of management is one point lower.

And extreme caution on wet asphalt requires Headway and Bridgestone tires: if you overdid it a little with speed, and the car goes into a prolonged slide. Cordiant tires also make you be on the lookout: there are very sharp breakdowns into a skid.

Artificial irregularities in the form of manholes and asphalt ledges help to assess the smoothness of the ride.

We appreciated the handling and braking properties on dry asphalt, but here the difference is smaller, and from the point of view of safety, it is not so critical. Exceeding the limits of tire grip on dry public roads is either deliberate hooliganism or an insidious combination of circumstances. Be that as it may, on dry asphalt the leaders and outsiders are about the same as on wet ones. Among the former are Goodyear and Hankook tires, while Chinese tires and Bridgestone round out the test report.

We assess comfort subjectively, and this is not from laziness: over many years of testing, we have more than once been convinced of the extremely low, or even absent, correlation of expert assessments and readings of vibrometers or sound level meters. However, this time it is not necessary to talk about significant differences in the influence of tires on comfort, although we drove on asphalt of different roughness, and shook on the calibrated irregularities. Of the total weight, only Bridgestone, Formula and Matador tires slightly stand out for the worse. There is little variation in ride, but worse than other Bridgestone, Headway and Tiger, and better - Goodyear. And that didn't surprise us: the high level of comfort is a hallmark of Goodyear tires, and almost all of our comparison tests confirm this.

The most accurate consumer method of "chemical analysis" of rubber is measuring the braking distance on wet asphalt. When braking from 80 km / h, the spread of results exceeds six meters!

And finally, an invitation to be executed. We fix a granite block with a height of 68 mm on the asphalt - and run over it with the right wheels at an angle of 45 °. We start at a speed of 40 km / h - and build it up until we break through the sidewall. This time - due to the higher profile - the limit was on average much higher than when testing 17-inch tires with a 45% profile (AP # 5, 2015), and we could not penetrate four tires even 90 km / h! These are Bridgestone, Hankook, Matador and Nokian. But Goodyear and Tiger gave up already at speeds of 60 and 70 km / h, respectively. They are too gentle, especially for those who drive not only on the capital but on toll roads. By the way, the Nokian Hakka Green 2 tire also expired at 60 km / h, but by the time of our tests it had already been decided to produce tires of this model with a reinforced carcass - such a tire “reached” 90 km / h.

A vehicle with stabilization system deactivated allows you to better assess the effect of tires on handling.By the way, you can't praise yourself ... It was with our suggestion that Nokian Tires began to carry out "shock" tests three years ago.

But in the end, even with the increased impact resistance, the new Nokian Hakka Green 2 tires take an honorable second place. And on the first, albeit with a minimal margin, the Korean tires Hankook Kinergy Eco K425. Strong, tenacious - and even interesting in terms of handling.

Impact test: at the end of the tests, even a granite block did not survive, but among the participating tires, four samples withstood a collision with this obstacle at a speed of more than 90 km / h!

The outsiders are Chinese tires, which is not surprising, but the failure Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 discouraged. However, they also have an indisputable dignity: they perfectly “take the blow”. It is curious that in the comparative tests carried out by our European colleagues, the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 tires look good. But this only suggests that Bridgestone tires for Western markets are baked from a higher quality "dough" than for Russia.

More than a hundred braking "to the floor" from a speed of 105 km / h - a serious test not only for tires, but also for the brakes of Solaris. We survived!

Hankook Kinergy Eco K425

Overall rating: 9.6

The "Eco" in the model name suggests low rolling resistance, although we did not get the impression that this is true. However, according to the European classification, Hankook tire Kinergy Eco is only the fourth efficiency class (E). But the adhesion properties on wet asphalt - according to the same marking - belong to the highest class A, and we had no reason to doubt this. On wet roads, excellent grip when braking and cornering.

On dry asphalt, Hankook tires have the shortest braking distances and are reliable in extreme situations. And in terms of smoothness on small bumps, they are second only to Goodyear tires.

These tires also hold the impact with dignity: even at a speed of 90 km / h, we could not break them against the calibrated curb.

As a result, we safely recommend Hankook Kinergy Eco tires for use on any roads, including broken ones.

Pros:

3. High impact resistance

Minuses:

1. Average rolling resistance

Nokian Hakka Green 2

Overall rating: 9.4

The new Nokian Hakka Green 2 tires in five standard sizes, including the test 185/65 R15, meet the highest AA class, that is, they combine reliable grip on wet surfaces and low rolling resistance. And according to the results of our measurements, Nokian tires have the lowest rolling resistance, but the main thing is that on wet asphalt they provide the minimum braking distance, and on the handling track - maximum speed cornering. True, the car "freezes" in slides a little more than on Goodyear or Hankook tires, and therefore the subjective score is lower.

On dry pavement, side slip and reaction lag are slightly more than we would like. Comfort indicators are average, but impact resistance is one of the best. Finnish tire workers focusing on Russian market, introduced a special under-tread layer made of high-strength steel cord into the structure. It is curious that "reinforced" tires are not at all heavier than conventional ones - and at the same time lighter than competing tires!

Another great option, although not the cheapest.

Pros:

1. Adhesion properties on dry and wet asphalt

2. Handling on wet asphalt

3. High impact resistance

4. Low rolling resistance

Minuses:

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Overall rating: 8.9

A promising "elite" name, and large bore diameters prevail in the size range.

On wet pavement, Goodyear tires prove their highest "grip" class A. And the car handles exemplary: clear reactions, soft start of sliding. But here's the problem: when the water level on the asphalt reaches 15 millimeters, these tires float up earlier than the main competitors. It's very strange, especially when you remember that it has always been strong point summer tires Goodyear. However, in the new European labeling (read - the system of tire values) resistance to aquaplaning is not reflected in any way, and if so, then the designers, apparently, decided that they should not strain themselves.

But the fact that during impact tests the tire gave up already at 60 km / h, we were not surprised: Goodyear tires had no good impact before. But - the softest comfortable rolling, and as a result - good tires for good roads.

Pros:

1. Adhesion properties on dry and wet asphalt

2. Handling on dry and wet asphalt

3. Comfort

4. Low rolling resistance

Minuses:

1. Low impact strength

Matador MP 44 Elite 3

Overall rating: 8.8

Two years ago, the Matador MP 44 Elite 3 tires have already earned high marks in our comparative test (AP # 6, 2014) - and they confirm this now. Grip on wet asphalt is at the level of the leaders of the test, although in fast corners a tendency to slip of the front end appeared.

And on a dry surface, the car reacts sluggishly to the steering wheel and requires increased steering angles. But on a straight line Solaris on tires Matador is stable.

Rolling noise is heard throughout the entire speed range, but its tonality is not annoying. When driving through irregularities, the level of vibration is acceptable, but in tight corners it is already accompanied by noticeable jolts on the steering wheel. We also praise these tires for their durability: we were unable to break them even at a speed of 90 km / h.

The tires are sturdy and inexpensive. And, apparently, their quality remains stable.

Pros:

1. Adhesion on wet asphalt

2. High impact resistance

3. Low rolling resistance

Minuses:

1. Average manageability

2. Average comfort level

Nokian Nordman SX

Overall rating: 8.6

For the "second line" tires, Nokian uses the tread patterns of previous generations: it simply changes the design of the sidewall and calls these tires Nordman. Curiously, Nordman tires of the same model may have different tread patterns. For example, the small Nordman SX is a "screenshot" of the tread of the Nokian i3 tires released in circulation. Some of the 15- and 16-inch models feature the Nokian H tire pattern, while the 17- and 18-inch Nordman SX models feature striking Nokian Z sports tread.

The Nordman SX tires offer excellent wet grip and ride pleasure as good as the Nokian Hakka Green 2. And on dry it is fine, although the simplified carcass contributes neither to impact resistance nor to reduced rolling resistance.

Decent tires of the "second line" - it is not a sin for such tires and it is not a sin to save money by refusing to buy the "original". That is, from the current generation of Nokian tires.

Pros:

1. Adhesion on wet asphalt

Minuses:

1. Average resistance to aquaplaning

Cordiant Road Runner

Overall rating: 8.2

Tires of Russian design, produced at the Yaroslavl Tire Plant, did not fade against the background of eminent competitors. On account of the tires Cordiant the best resistance to aquaplaning, good and "wet" grip in the longitudinal direction. And braking performance on wet pavement is decent. But on the handling track, a surprise awaited us: the car suddenly acquired a tendency to skid, and such that only manage to catch the car!

This tendency persisted on dry surfaces, albeit to a lesser extent. Comfort and shock resistance are fine, but rolling resistance is not.

Somewhat successful tires, but the problem is a poor balance of consumer qualities.

Pros:

1. Adhesion on wet asphalt

2. High resistance to aquaplaning

Minuses:

1. The tendency of the car to skid on wet and dry asphalt

2. High rolling resistance

Formula Energy

Overall rating: 8.2

The factories of the bankrupt Amtel company in Kirov and Voronezh were bought by the Pirelli concern - and after the modernization, the production of tires under the Pirelli and Formula brands ("second line") began there.

The good pedigree of Formula Energy tires is evidenced by their low rolling resistance and a neat asymmetrical tread pattern. However, it turned out to be ineffective on "big water": the car floats up before everyone else! But on wet pavement, the tires work well both longitudinally and transversely. And the sliding is soft and predictable.

On dry pavement, the responsiveness of Pirelli tires is quick and clear. However, there is a lot of noise, especially on rough asphalt at speeds over 100 km / h. But the impact resistance is at a height.

Not a bad option in terms of value for money.

Pros:

1. Adhesion on wet asphalt

3. Low rolling resistance

Minuses:

1. Low resistance to aquaplaning

Tigar sigura

Overall rating: 8.1

Tigar tires are manufactured at a factory in Serbia, which has been owned by Michelin since 2010. Now these tires are not very popular, although in the old years they were even supplied to Togliatti and Nizhny Novgorod for the original equipment of cars.

On wet asphalt, the grip is moderate - and, contrary to expectations, the directional tread pattern did not please with drainage possibilities: aquaplaning starts early. The tires are also not impressive on the wet handling track, although it is easy to drive the car along the optimal trajectory - thanks to the excellent balance of grip properties in the longitudinal and transverse directions.

The reactions on dry asphalt are also pleasant: smooth but precise.

There is nothing more to boast of these tires. Compared to competitors, Tigar tires are harsh, but at the same time they do not hold a blow: the sidewall was punctured at a speed of 70 km / h.

If you need inexpensive tires for good road use, the Tigar can also be considered.

Pros:

1. Reliable handling on wet and dry asphalt

Minuses:

1. Insufficient resistance to aquaplaning

2. Low impact strength

Headway HH301

Overall rating: 7.6

Chinese Headway tires are better known to truck drivers, especially in America. And the plant for the production of passenger tires was opened in 2013.

The HH301 tires are unremarkable for both the old-fashioned tread pattern and the run-of-the-mill properties. Weak grip on both wet and dry asphalt, but they resist aquaplaning quite well. And do not annoy with rolling noise. Although the ride is poor: the car shakes more on short waves than on other tires. Rolling is also hard, so besides resistance to aquaplaning, the only merit is shock resistance - but this is perhaps not enough to deserve our recommendation. Even the price is not captivating.

Pros:

1. High resistance to aquaplaning

2. High impact resistance

Minuses:

1. Low grip on dry and wet asphalt

2. Low ride smoothness

3. High rolling resistance

GT Radial Champiro Eco

Overall rating: 7.5

Giti Tire is one of the largest tire manufacturers in the world! Six factories in China, one in Indonesia, and in 2014 production was launched in the United States.

According to the accompanying papers, the GT Radial Champiro Eco tires correspond to the European class C in terms of rolling resistance, and class B in terms of grip on wet asphalt. The declared indicators are higher than those of Matador tires! But our observations cast doubt on the sincerity of the Chinese tire workers. If on Matador tires the braking distance from 80 km / h on wet asphalt does not exceed 30 meters, then on GT Radial - 34 meters! And in other disciplines, these tires do not shine, although the behavior is not bad: the car is easy to control in transient modes.

On dry asphalt, the braking distance is the longest, the car reacts sluggishly to the steering wheel, in response to the gas discharge, it goes into a poorly controlled skid. Noise, vibration and shock resistance are average.

We don't see the slightest point in buying these tires, especially when less expensive and better quality Matador, Formula or Cordiant tires are on the counter.

Pros:

1. Reliable handling on wet asphalt

2. Average impact strength

Minuses:

1. Low grip on dry and wet asphalt

2. Low resistance to aquaplaning

3. Dry handling

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Overall rating: 6.9

The Thailand-made Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 is a disappointment in our test. The braking distance of the car on wet asphalt at a speed of 80 km / h increased by as much as seven meters compared to the leading tires. And arrivals on the wet handling track made me remember the techniques of counter-emergency driving on ice: sliding begins at a harmless speed. And in puddles, Bridgestone tires float early.

On dry asphalt, the performance is not much better: the car brakes mediocrely, reacts sluggishly to control, and the steering information content also suffered.

Bridgestone tires are both noisier and tougher than most competitors. One consolation is impact resistance (thanks to the two-layer carcass, although the rest of the tires have a single-layer carcass). And in this case, this is doubly important, since low adhesion properties will most likely lead to the fact that you will have to face obstacles more often.

• Test start date: 22 August 2016
• End date of the test: 20 September 2016
• Road quality: Good
• Vehicle: Scoda Octavia

Summer test drive tires 195 / 65R15

Fifteen-inch tires for small cars are the most widespread. Most cars of class B and even C, sold in Europe on "sixteenth" and larger wheels, in our market, shoes are mainly in the budget "fifteenth" size. And it's not just more low prices such a shoe. On our roads, tires with a higher profile are more comfortable and durable. Moreover, they protect the suspension consumables ( ball joints, silent blocks, shock absorbers) from high shock loads, promoting their life.

As vehicle Skoda Octavia of the second generation was selected for testing. The test site was the AVTOVAZ test site near Togliatti. During the tests, the temperature ranged from +20 to +30 degrees. Current tire models do not require running-in. The developers advise to overcome only 2 km. Then you can start.

Summer tire tests 195 / 65R15

The tests are carried out in an order that takes into account the degree of tire wear as they pass.

Test drive start

First, a 10 km roundabout is carried out. The expert drives several laps at a speed of 130 km / h. This is the highest speed limit in the country. Exchange rate stability is assessed during the races. Michelin tires took first place in this test. They respond quickly and clearly to steering movements.

Next, we checked the efficiency indicators. 3-5 runs in opposite directions are carried out. This is necessary to exclude the influence of the wind. The result is the arithmetic mean of the tests in different directions. Now the economy is at good level and is not much different, but the Hakka Green tires were able to save 0.1-0.3 l / 100 km at 60 km / h compared to other models.

Experts move on to wet braking. For the accuracy of the results, a special VBOX is used. Each tire has 6-8 runs. Hakka Green took first place. Continental are 0.9m behind.

The main results of tests 195 / 65R15

Braking on dry asphalt is carried out from 100 km / h. Continental tires became the leader. The second place is 10 cm behind - Nokian. Michelin's were the worst on both types of surfaces.

Rearrangement. Its result is not just the best, but the reproducible one. Here the strength of the frame, lateral grip, steering response in an emergency maneuvering situation is assessed.

Hakka Green performed better on the wet test. They showed the highest speed and maneuverability. Continental lagged behind a little in speed, but lost in handling.

On a dry road, the first place was shared by Amtel, Continental and Nokian. Kumho were only 0.1 km / h behind.

results

• Nokian Hakka Green 2 195 / 65R15 XL 95H tires

  Better braking properties on wet asphalt; the best speed of performing "dry" rearrangement; strict adherence to the course; understandable handling during extreme maneuvering.

  Minor remarks about comfort.

  Buy 1

• Tires Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde 195 / 65R15 91V

  Better grip on dry asphalt; high - on wet; high adhesion properties and understandable handling during extreme maneuvering; good directional stability.

  Notes on noise; minor remarks regarding the smoothness of the ride.

  Buy 1

• Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 195 / 65R15 91H tires

  High braking properties on dry roads; high speed of transferring both on dry and wet asphalt.

  Minor remarks about directional stability, handling during extreme maneuvering and comfort.

  Buy 2

• Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 195 / 65R15 91V tires

  The highest speed of transferring on wet asphalt, high - on dry; high properties on dry roads.

  Does not contribute to fuel economy at high speed; minor remarks about directional stability, handling during extreme maneuvering and comfort.

  Buy 2

• Tires Hankook Optimo K425 Kinergy Eco 195 / 65R15 91V

  High speed and understandable handling during extreme maneuvering on dry asphalt; the best smoothness of the course.

  Minor remarks about directional stability, handling during extreme maneuvering on wet asphalt and noise.

  Buy 3

• Nokian Nordman SX2 195 / 65R15 91H tires

  Comprehensible handling during extreme maneuvering on both dry and wet asphalt.

  Increased fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h; minor remarks on directional stability, smoothness and noise.

  Buy 4

• Toyo Proxes CF2 195 / 65R15 91H tires

  Comprehensible handling during extreme maneuvering both on dry and on wet asphalt.

  low speed of transferring on a dry road; comments about comfort.

  Buy 5

• Tires Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 195 / 65R15 XL 91V

  Decent braking properties on wet asphalt.

  Ride and Noise Notes.

  Buy 6

• Tires Cordiant Sport 3 195 / 65R15 91V

  Stable handling during extreme maneuvering on dry asphalt.

  Worst profitability; difficult handling during extreme maneuvering on wet asphalt; remarks about directional stability and ride.

  Buy 7

• Tires Matador MP44 Elite 3 195 / 65R15 91H

  High fuel efficiency; stable handling during extreme maneuvering on wet asphalt.

When one size is selected, it is easy to carry out comparative analysis, to figure out which of the products is worthy of becoming a leader or his destiny is outsider. Let's pay attention in the article to the peculiarities of tires made in different countries in order to understand how in Italy, Japan, Holland and Slovenia they understand the "quality mark" in the automotive industry, what tires 195 65 r15 are added to the rating in the summer. Products will be compared in pairs. Initially, let's pay attention to the products of Japan and Italy, and then analyze who is stronger - Holland or Slovenia in the imposed duel for quality.

Summer tires 195 65 r15

Representative from Italy -

Manufactured Pirelli tires Cinturato P1 Eco for small or compact passenger cars, are included in the rating of summer tires 195 65 15 for a number of advantages that consumers attribute to the product. Car enthusiasts often note that the car, shod in the Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco, goes easily and confidently, such driving simply gives pleasure to the driver, guarantees safety. And it is not in vain that rubber has the Eco postscript, that is, it does not spoil the ecology of the region, and this is an important fact in the twenty-first century. The desired result was achieved due to the fact that the level of gasoline consumption was reduced, as well as the noise effect of the rubber. The Eco prefix was deserved by this product during numerous test drives, according to the results of which the progress achieved by the developers of Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco in the automotive industry was realized. As a result - awards, participation in exhibitions and a rating of summer tires 195 65 15.

Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires

When the designated model was developed, a number of innovations were introduced in order to achieve striking results in the matter of reducing tire weight. And there is a result - the rubber has become lighter by almost 15%. The developers also fought for acoustic comfort, and here again a victory awaited - outwardly, the tire produces a noise of 1.5 dB, and only insignificant echoes with a power of 1 dB are heard in the cabin.

Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires have been appreciated in European countries, it is not in vain that they complement the rating of summer tires 195 65 r15.

For the Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires, we have also developed a reliable innovative tread pattern, in which wide and sufficiently deep longitudinal grooves can be seen. There are also special slats, their whole elaborated system. And in the perfectly assembled composition, they protect the contact patch from rain flows, dirt, dust of dirt roads, as well as small gravel on country stitches.

Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires

Determine the features of the Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires

• Sufficient resistance to aquaplaning is performed
• Confident road grip
• Wear-resistant tread pattern

Thus, the Italian Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco tires are included in the 195 65 r15 summer tire rating and are valued in Europe as a product with the Eco index. And what can you tell about the rival of Italy - Japan, which also enters into a duel for leadership in products of standard size 195 65 r15. In a competitive battle, two different temperaments and mentality will be opposed. So what does Japan offer?

Representative from Japan - Bridgestone Turanza T001

Japanese tires 195 65 r15 summer complement the rating and are quality tires, tested on race tracks and product testing races. Before that, the Japanese tire Bridgestone Turanza ER300 was on the market, which was considered simply the standard of reliability and predictable maneuverability, and the next generation turned out to be innovative and interesting to consumers. It is believed that the Bridgestone Turanza T001 feels best at high speeds and long routes, and in general all its characteristics are so balanced that operating such a tire is simply comfortable and reliable, and financially beneficial.

Bridgestone tires Turanza T001

What innovations were used in the manufacture of Bridgestone Turanza T001

• Japanese tires 195 65 r15 summer often supplement the rating, because they are famous for their low noise and acceptable acoustic comfort. The fact is that the product has a Helmholtz resonator, which is formed by the shape of the existing protector. The developers made such a pattern that with its transverse drainage grooves and walls it creates the shape of multiple vessels, and now they perform the function of a resonator.
• Another term that allowed Bridgestone Turanza T001 to complement the rating of 195 65 15 summer tires is called NanoPro-Tech in the article. What is it? - A special composition of rubber, where the dominant component is a special polymer, which reduces the removal of heat from the tread, which occurs as a result of friction between the molecules of the existing carbohydrate. As a result, the special rubber composition had a positive effect on the wear resistance of the product, and also reduced the degree of rolling resistance.
• Bridgestone Turanza T001 is a tire with an asymmetrical pattern, that is, in the very center of the pattern, three wide longitudinal and deep enough grooves are noticeable, they form a well-functioning drainage system. The shoulder areas of the tread are specially enlarged, so the braking process is carried out without unnecessary difficulties, and this characteristic is one of the most important, on which the hit in the rating of summer tires 195 65 r15 depends.
• In stock the product of the Japanese brand Bridgestone - a flat contact patch, quite reliable, amenable to uniform wear.

Thus, the Bridgestone Turanza T001, as a tire of Japanese quality, is an example of bold innovations, but the Italian product of the car industry - Pirelli Cinturato P1 Eco - is an example of traditions and norms. And this is the announcement of such tires 195 65 r15 summer, the rating from which will not go anywhere: they will always be in a state of competition and a constant process of improvement.

Duel: Holland vs Slovenia, or which tires are better

We can say that the Italians are behind the Dutch Vredestein Sportrac 5 tire, who have been supervising this product for a long time, even worked on its design. And the Slovenian product Sava Intensa HP is also made in the spirit of European proven technologies, it seems that the two products are on an equal footing, are able to share one place in the rating of 195 65 r15 summer tires, and qualify for bronze. They can be attributed to the following general merits:

• Acoustic comfort, resonance noises and vibrations seem to be very well controlled
• Dutch and Slovenian tires 195 65 r15 summer, which have formed a rating, are distinguished by their resistance to the undesirable effect of aquaplaning

Thus, we understand that in Italy, Japan, Holland and Slovenia they are not afraid of progress in rubber production, they try to work out every new model trying to make it reliable and safe. Whose side are you on, which country's rubber do you prefer?

About tires About disks Reviews and articles News Tests of tires and disks Video Career in the company Contacts Corporate clients Reviews about the company About the company

Summer tire test 195/65 R15

Fifteen-inch tires are quite firmly established in the budget car niche and continue to displace smaller sizes from it. For the test, the experts of the magazine "Za Rulem" chose the dimension 195/65 R15, which is most often found on a relatively available cars grades B and C, and focused on the most popular tires. On tests - twelve sets.

Before the start
The tests were carried out at the end of summer 2015 at the AVTOVAZ test site near Togliatti, where they collected all the novelties of the 2016 spring-summer season. During the tests, the air warmed up to + 20 ... + 30 ºС.
The well-known Hankook Kinergy Eco and a novelty from Finland - the Nokian Hakka Green 2 tire can serve as a kind of watershed in the price range.
Cheaper than their familiar to many domestic tires Nordman SX, Yokohama BluEarth AE01, Cordiant Sport 3 and a novelty of the Korean company Kumho - the Ecowing ES01 model, made in China. And the most affordable in this test is the Amtel Planet Evo tire, the novelty of the season. Pirelli considered the brand leaving the market well promoted in Russia and decided to breathe new life into it using modern technical solutions and technologies.
More expensive test participants are very popular Continental tires ContiPremiumContact 5 as well as Japanese Toyo proxes CF2 and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance. There are two more models in the same price group: for the first time, Michelin Energy XM2 tires made in Russia and Japanese Bridgestone Turanza T001 tires are participating in the Za Rulem tests.
It is gratifying that five of the twelve models are of domestic production.
For budget tires, you need to choose the appropriate car. Experts liked "Behind the wheel" Skoda Octavia second generation. Due to age, this inexpensive car but in perfect condition. And it also does not have a stabilization system, which is in the hands of experts: the electronics will not interfere with the exercise.

Test procedures

Modern summer tires do not require running-in. This is confirmed by all manufacturers: before the tests, it is enough to drive a couple of kilometers - and they are ready for testing. So for summer tires, not only the procedure, but the very expression "running in" is an anachronism.
The sequence of test exercises is built taking into account the intensity of tire wear. Experts began with an assessment of efficiency, practically not accompanied by wear and tear, and ended with a "dry" rearrangement, during which the asphalt rips off the shoulder areas of tires like emery.
The study of the behavior of a car at high speed is called by the experts "Behind the wheel" an assessment of directional stability. A few laps along the ten-kilometer high-speed ring of the polygon at a speed of 130 km / h are enough to understand how clearly the tires hold the given direction, how they react to side winds and road slopes, how they behave when avoiding obstacles and changing lanes. In parallel, the ride smoothness and internal noise at high speed were evaluated. Why 130 km / h? So after all, in our country, this is the maximum possible speed established on some sections of toll roads. In addition, on most highways, the Rules allow you to keep 110, and if you add the "free" 20 km / h excess, you get the same 130 km / h. No, no, the experts "Behind the Wheel" are not for violation of the speed limit - but many people drive this way, don't they?
The Michelin tires received the highest marks for directional stability - the steering wheel of the Skoda shod in them becomes very clear, with a well-understood "zero". I liked the immediate reactions to steering turns and the high information content when adjusting the course.
When the tires and drivetrain are thoroughly warmed up, the vehicle is ready for a fuel economy assessment. The result of each measurement is the arithmetic mean of the values ​​obtained in two races in opposite directions (in order to neutralize the possible influence of the wind). For each set of tires, the exercise has to be repeated from three times (with complete calm) to five (in case of a light breeze).
Measurements are carried out in descending order - first at high speed, then at low speed. Thanks to this, the tires and transmission cool down smoothly and the measurement results jump less.
Over the past years, the majority of tires have had equally good fuel economy figures. However, the second generation Hakka Green did the impossible - at a speed of 60 km / h, it provided fuel savings of 0.1-0.3 l / 100 km relative to the rest of the tires. A real green tire!

brand, model		12th place	11th place	10th place	9th place
		Kumho Ecowing ES01	Michelin Energy XM2	Bridgestone Turanza T001	Hankook Kinergy Eco
Country of manufacture		China	Russia	Japan	Hungary
Load and speed indices		91H	91H	91V	91V
Tread pattern		asymmetric	asymmetric	asymmetric	asymmetric
		6.7-6.9	7.2-7.5	7.6-7.9	7.4-7.7
		72	68	74	71
Tire weight, kg		8.7	8.3	8.6	8.3
(Maximum 180 points)	m	26.6	28.7	28.2	26.5
	scores	167.1	154.9	157.7	167.8
Maximum 160 points)	m	40.3	42.2	41.6	40.0
	scores	152.9	146.0	148.1	154.0
(Maximum 160 points)	km / h	66.9	64.5	67.3	64.7
	scores	157.2	151.5	158.1	152.0
(Maximum 140 points)	km / h	68.1	64.6	67.8	66.5
	scores	139.8	132.6	139.2	136.5
Behavior: Expert judgment
Maximum 80 points)	scores	48	48	48	56
Maximum 60 points)	scores	42	48	42	42
Maximum 50 points)	scores	30	45	35	35
Out of offset)	scores	5	6	7	5
Comfort: Expert judgment
Internal noise ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	15	21	21	18
Smooth running ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	15	21	21	18
(Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	6.2	6.1	6.1	6.1
	scores	59	60	60	60
(Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	4.5	4.4	4.4	4.5
	scores	47.8	48.9	48.9	47.8
The amount of points awarded		874	877	879	887
pros		Fast transfer speed on dry asphalt	Super clear course following; modest fuel consumption; clear handling on dry asphalt	High speed of transferring on dry asphalt; modest fuel consumption	Modest fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h
Minuses		Notes on directional stability; difficult handling on wet surfaces; low comfort level	Poor adhesion properties; difficult handling on wet asphalt	Mediocre adhesion properties; difficult handling on wet surfaces	Low level of comfort; low speed of transferring on wet surfaces

Having finished with economy, the experts circle the service roads. Here, on road patches, seams, cracks and special irregularities, the smoothness of the ride and the noise level in the cabin were once again assessed - in more severe conditions, as close to real ones as possible.
In these exercises, they showed themselves not from the best side against the background of others. Kumho tires: at a speed of 90-100 km / h, they emit an unpleasant low-frequency hum; on road irregularities, shaking and vibrations annoy.
Before returning to the base, the experts taxied on a 12% dirt rise, simulating a dacha road. Here, subjectively (without measurements), the ability of the tires to start and accelerate on a primer (with dust and sand) was assessed. The exercise is somewhat reminiscent of the assessment of passability in deep snow: the expert tries to get under way and accelerate with and without slipping; checks how much the traction drops when slipping, whether it is difficult to control the moment of wheel breakdown into slipping.
The Za Rulem experts remind that the “soil” test is optional, its results do not count towards the overall standings, but are presented only as additional information. He was introduced into the test program at the request of readers who were interested in the possibilities of tires on unpaved roads.

Wet business
The next test is braking on wet asphalt, because on it, especially with the use of ABS, the tires wear out minimally.
We started the test ... by stripping the coating. We performed a dozen or a half brakes on non-scoring tires - in this way we thoroughly “swept” the asphalt, removing dust, grass and very small stones swept by the wind from it. After this procedure, the asphalt becomes clean and the adhesion coefficient is stable.
According to the method used today by both tire manufacturers and independent experts, the braking distance on wet asphalt was measured when decelerating from 80 to 5 km / h - since at speeds close to zero, the ABS does not work correctly, sometimes allowing the wheels to lock, which leads to distortion of results. Many tire companies set a different minimum speed threshold in their internal tests - they finish measurements at 7 or even 10 km / h.
To get heaps of results, it is important not only to start braking at the same point, but also to approach it at the same speed. Experts "Behind the wheel" kept 83-85 km / h - not by the speedometer, but by the high-precision measuring device VBOX. The braking corridor should be very narrow - they braked literally trail after trail. This is extremely important: a dozen centimeters (only half the tread width) to the side - and the surface has a different coefficient of adhesion, which means that the result will float away.
Before braking, the tester must be sure that the brakes are cold, which means that their effectiveness is maximized. Therefore, after each measurement, the pads and discs must be cooled - when returning to the starting position, the driver does not use the brakes, the speed is extinguished by shifting to lower gears. By the way, that's why they chose a car with a manual transmission.
The average number of brakes is six. Sometimes, if the tires show unstable results, you have to add a couple more runs.
Continental tires, as usual, "brought" the closest rivals about a meter of saved braking distance. But what was the surprise of the experts when the new Hakka Green 2 tires beat them by almost the same amount!

brand, model		8th place	7th place	6th place	5th place
		Cordiant Sport 3	Yokohama BluEarth AE01	Continental ContiPremiumContact 5	Nordman SX
Country of manufacture		Russia	Russia	France	Russia
Load and speed indices		91V	91T	91H	91H
Tread pattern		asymmetric	symmetric	asymmetric	asymmetric
Depth of the pattern in width, mm		7.3-7.8	7.1-7.5	7.5-8.1	7.8-8.1
Shore hardness of rubber, unit		71	69	76	73
Tire weight, kg		8.5	8.5	7.8	8.6
Safety: Measurements of adhesion properties
Braking distance (80-5 km / h) on wet asphalt(Maximum 180 points)	m	27.0	26.1	25.6	26.5
	scores	164.7	170.3	173.7	167.8
Braking distance (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt ( Maximum 160 points)	m	40.5	40.7	38.5	41.1
	scores	152.1	151.4	160	149.9
Swap speed on wet asphalt (Maximum 160 points)	km / h	67.3	66.6	67.9	64.8
	scores	158.1	156.5	159.5	152.2
Transfer speed on dry asphalt(Maximum 140 points)	km / h	67.3	67.8	68.2	66.6
	scores	138.2	139.2	140	136.7
Behavior: Expert judgment
Handling while swapping on wet asphalt ( Maximum 80 points)	scores	56	56	48	64
Controllability during transfer on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	scores	48	36	36	48
Heading stability and direction adjustment at high speed ( Maximum 50 points)	scores	30	35	30	35
Climbing a dirt road ( Out of offset)	scores	7	6	6	5
Comfort: Expert judgment
Internal noise ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	18	18	18	21
Smooth running ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	18	18	18	21
Environmental friendliness: Fuel consumption measurements
Fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h (Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	6.3	6.1	6.2	6.2
	scores	58.1	60	59	59
Fuel consumption at a speed of 60 km / h(Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	4.6	4.4	4.5	4.5
	scores	46.7	48.9	47.8	47.8
The amount of points awarded		888	889	890	902
pros		Comprehensible handling during extreme maneuvering on dry surfaces; high speed of transferring on wet surfaces	Modest fuel consumption;high speed of transferring on dry asphalt	Excellent adhesion on dry and wet asphalt, high transfer speed on dry and wet asphalt	Comprehensible handling during extreme maneuvering
Minuses		Uneconomical; there are comments about exchange rate stability; low level of comfort	Low level of comfort;difficult handling during extreme maneuvering on dry surfaces	Difficult handling during extreme maneuvering,comments on exchange rate stability;low level of comfort	Low speed on the transfer on wet surfaces; minornotes on directional stability and comfort

Wear
Experts "Behind the Wheel" switched to more wear-resistant exercises. The first is braking on dry asphalt. The technique is, in fact, the same as on wet, but braking from 100 km / h - accordingly, the speed of approach to the braking point is 103-105 km / h. For the subsequent cooling of the brakes, it is necessary to make a larger circle.
In this exercise, I was pleased with the stability of the Continental - for many years in the tests "Behind the wheel" it consistently brakes better than others. Nokian came close to the leader, but could not get up level - the loss was meager 100 millimeters. And Michelin upset - showed the weakest braking properties both on dry asphalt and on wet.
In conclusion - the most interesting and indicative, but at the same time the most difficult test for the pilot: the rearrangement, which is also called a single lane change. The driver's task is to find the maximum possible speed at which the car will successfully perform a maneuver and stay on a given trajectory, that is, it will not knock down any of the cones that mark the entrance and exit corridors. Arrivals begin with a deliberately passing speed, and with each subsequent approach, it is increased by 1-2 km / h. It is not just that it counts best result, but one that can be repeated.
This exercise, on the one hand, is taken from real life- how many lovers of fussing between the rows on our roads! On the other hand, it allows you to evaluate the lateral grip and drift characteristics of tires, the ability of the carcass to withstand sharply increasing, literally peak lateral loads and steering precision during extreme maneuvering.
The geometrical parameters of the rearrangement are also not sucked out of the finger - the width of the strips is 3.5 meters, as on a real road. But on the first lane, the "track" is clamped by cones so that on each side the car has a margin of no more than 100 millimeters. This forces the tester to use the same path at the input. The length of the transition from the left to the right lane is 12 meters. GOST for car testing regulates 12-, 16-, 20- and 24-meter rearrangements. And the maximum lateral load on the tires is provided by the 12-meter one.
First, a rearrangement is performed on wet asphalt, and under the curtain this exercise is repeated on a dry surface, where the tires get more than in total in all previous exercises.
On the wet road, both in speed and handling, the updated Nokian Hakka Green tires were ahead of the rest. Continental tires turned out to be very close in terms of maximum speed of rearrangement, but in terms of handling they noticeably lose.
The most interesting results were obtained on dry asphalt - here the best speed (68.2 km / h) was simultaneously shown by three tires: Amtel, Continental and Nokian, and the result of Kumho (68.1 km / h) is only one tenth more modest.

brand, model		4th place	3rd place	2nd place	1st place
		Toyo Proxes CF2	Amtel Planet Evo	Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance	Nokian Hakka Green 2
Country of manufacture		Japan	Russia	Germany	Finland
Load and speed indices		91H	91H	91V	95H
Tread pattern		asymmetric	asymmetric	asymmetric	asymmetric
Depth of the pattern in width, mm		7.2-8.4	6.4-6.9	7.8-7.9	7.7-8.1
Shore hardness of rubber, unit		71	71	73	66
Tire weight, kg		8.8	8.2	7.4	7.8
Safety: Measurements of adhesion properties
Braking distance (80-5 km / h) on wet asphalt(Maximum 180 points)	m	26.5	27.0	26.7	24.7
	scores	167.8	164.7	166.5	180
Braking distance (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt ( Maximum 160 points)	m	38.7	40.4	38.9	38.6
	scores	159.2	152.5	158.4	159.6
Swap speed on wet asphalt (Maximum 160 points)	km / h	66.7	67.5	67.5	68.1
	scores	156.7	158.6	158.6	160
Transfer speed on dry asphalt(Maximum 140 points)	km / h	67.0	68.2	67.8	68.2
	scores	137.5	140	139.2	140
Behavior: Expert judgment
Handling while swapping on wet asphalt ( Maximum 80 points)	scores	56	64	64	72
Controllability during transfer on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	scores	36	48	42	48
Heading stability and direction adjustment at high speed ( Maximum 50 points)	scores	40	30	35	40
Climbing a dirt road ( Out of offset)	scores	5	8	6	6
Comfort: Expert judgment
Internal noise ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	24	21	21	24
Smooth running ( Maximum 30 points)	scores	21	21	21	21
Environmental friendliness: Fuel consumption measurements
Fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h (Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	6.1	6.1	6.1	6.1
	scores	60	60	60	60
Fuel consumption at a speed of 60 km / h(Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	4.4	4.5	4.4	4.3
	scores	48.9	47.8	48.9	50
The amount of points awarded		907	908	915	955
pros		High adhesion properties on dry asphalt; modest fuel consumption; high directional stability; quiet	Modest fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h; understandable handling andhigh grip properties during extreme maneuvering	Excellent grip on dry asphalt; high speed of rearrangement; good handling on wet asphalt; modest fuel consumption	Best braking on wet asphalt and very good on dry; strict adherence to the course; understandable handling during extreme maneuvering; the most economical
Minuses		Difficult handling in extreme maneuvering on dry asphalt	Notes on directional stability, minor notes on noise and ride	Insignificant notes on directional stability, handling during extreme maneuvering on dry asphalt and comfort	Minor ride notes

We got up heap!
Perhaps the best way to start the epilogue is to congratulate the winner of the test, and these are Nokian Hakka Green 2 tires. Nevertheless, all the tires that took part in the tests were a pleasant surprise.
First, we were pleased with the accuracy of the final results. The tires in the last seven places have a difference in final points of less than two percent! In fact, this is close to the measurement error. Secondly, all tires have shown themselves to be very worthy, while their prices are more or less affordable.
The Za Rulem experts will once again remind you of the final grading system. Tires that have scored more than 850 points are called good, 870 or more points are called very good, and those that have crossed the line of 900 points are excellent. In the current test, no one dropped below 870 points! Seven test participants have very good results, five excellent.
The most pleasant thing is to see inexpensive "Russians" as excellent students - Nordman SX tires and the reviving Amtel Planet Evo. For times of crisis - the most tempting offers.

Fifteen-inch tires are quite firmly established in the budget car niche and continue to displace smaller sizes from it. For the test, we chose the dimension 195/65 R15, which is most often found on relatively affordable cars of classes B and C, and stopped our eyes on the most popular tires at a price of 2200 to 3500 rubles. On tests - twelve sets.

The tests of the air defense system were carried out at the end of last summer at the AVTOVAZ test site near Togliatti, where they collected all the new items for the upcoming spring-summer 2016 season. During the tests, the air warmed up to + 20 ... + 30 ºС.

A kind of watershed in the price range can be the well-known Hankook Kinergy Eco on the market for 2800 rubles and a novelty from Finland - the second generation Nokian Hakka Green tire, which can be bought for 3100 rubles.

Cheaper than their familiar domestic tires Nordman SX (2700 rubles), Yokohama BluEarth AE01 (2550 rubles), Cordiant Sport 3 (2400 rubles) and a novelty of the Korean company Kumho - the Ecowing ES01 model (2500 rubles), made in China. And the most affordable in our test is the Amtel Planet Evo tire (2200 rubles), a novelty of the season. Pirelli considered the brand leaving the market well promoted in Russia and decided to breathe new life into it using modern technical solutions and technologies.

More expensive test participants are the very popular Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 tires (3500 rubles), as well as Japanese Toyo Proxes CF2 (3400 rubles) and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (3450 rubles). There are two more models in the same price group: for the first time, Michelin Energy XM2 tires (3500 rubles), produced in Russia, and Japanese Bridgestone Turanza T001 (3500 rubles), participate in our tests.

It is gratifying that five of the twelve models are of domestic production.

For budget tires, you need to choose the appropriate car. We liked Skoda Octavia second generations. Due to its age, this is an inexpensive car, but in perfect condition. And she also does not have a stabilization system, which suits us: the electronics will not interfere with the exercise.

Actual Autonews

Test procedures summer tire test 195/65 R15

Modern summer tires do not require running-in. This is confirmed by all manufacturers: before the tests, it is enough to drive a couple of kilometers - and they are ready for testing. So for summer tires, not only the procedure, but the very expression "running in" is an anachronism.

The sequence of test exercises is built taking into account the intensity of tire wear. We start with an assessment of efficiency, which is practically not accompanied by wear and tear, and end with a "dry" rearrangement, during which the asphalt peels off the shoulder areas of the tires like emery.

Investigation of the behavior of a car at high speed is what we call Evaluation of Vehicle Stability. A few laps along the ten-kilometer high-speed ring of the polygon at a speed of 130 km / h are enough to understand how clearly the tires hold the given direction, how they react to side winds and road slopes, how they behave when avoiding obstacles and changing lanes. In parallel, we evaluate the smoothness and internal noise at high speed. Why 130 km / h? So after all, in our country, this is the maximum possible speed established on some sections of toll roads. In addition, on most highways, the Rules allow you to keep 110, and if you add the "free" 20 km / h excess, you get the same 130 km / h. No, no, we are not for violation of the speed limit - but after all, many people drive this way, don't they?

The Michelin tires received the highest marks for directional stability - the steering wheel of the Skoda shod in them becomes very clear, with a well-understood "zero". I liked the immediate reactions to steering turns and the high information content when adjusting the course.

When the tires and drivetrain are thoroughly warmed up, the vehicle is ready for a fuel economy assessment. The result of each measurement is the arithmetic mean of the values ​​obtained in two races in opposite directions (in order to neutralize the possible influence of the wind). For each set of tires, the exercise has to be repeated from three times (with complete calm) to five (in case of a light breeze).

Measurements are carried out in descending order - first at high speed, then at low speed. Thanks to this, the tires and transmission cool down smoothly and the measurement results jump less.

Over the past years, the majority of tires have had equally good fuel economy figures. However, the second generation Hakka Green did the impossible - at a speed of 60 km / h, it provided fuel savings of 0.1–0.3 l / 100 km relative to the rest of the tires. A real green tire!

Having finished with economy, we make a circle along the service roads. Here, on road patches, seams, cracks and special irregularities, we once again evaluate the smoothness and noise level in the cabin - in more severe conditions, as close to real ones as possible.

In these exercises, the Kumho tires showed themselves not from the best side against the background of others: at a speed of 90–100 km / h they emit an unpleasant low-frequency hum, on road irregularities shaking and vibrations annoy.

Automotive news in Russia

Before returning to the base, we taxied on a 12% dirt rise, imitating a summer cottage road. Here, subjectively (without measurements), we assess the ability of the tires to start and accelerate on a primer (with dust and sand). The exercise is somewhat reminiscent of the assessment of passability in deep snow: the expert tries to get under way and accelerate with and without slipping; checks how much the traction drops when slipping, whether it is difficult to control the moment of wheel breakdown into slipping.

Let me remind you that the "ground" test is optional, its results are not included in the overall standings, but are presented only as additional information. We introduced it to the test program at the request of readers who were interested in the capabilities of tires on unpaved roads.

The next test is braking on wet asphalt, because on it, especially with the use of ABS, the tires wear out minimally.

We begin the test ... by stripping the coating. We carry out a dozen or a half of braking on non-scoring tires - thus we thoroughly "sweep" the asphalt, removing dust, grass and very small stones swept by the wind from it. After such a procedure, the asphalt becomes clean, and the coefficient of adhesion is stable.

According to the methodology used today by both tire manufacturers and independent experts, we measure the braking distance on wet asphalt when decelerating from 80 to 5 km / h - since at speeds close to zero, the ABS does not work correctly, sometimes allowing the wheels to lock, which leads to distortion of results. Many tire companies set a different minimum speed threshold in their internal tests - they finish measurements at 7 or even 10 km / h.

To get heaps of results, it is important not only to start braking at the same point, but also to approach it at the same speed. We keep 83-85 km / h - not by the speedometer, but by the high-precision measuring device VBOX. The deceleration corridor should be very narrow - we decelerate literally trail after trail. This is extremely important: a dozen centimeters (only half the tread width) to the side - and the surface has a different coefficient of adhesion, which means that the result will float away.

Before braking, the tester must be sure that the brakes are cold, which means that their effectiveness is maximized. Therefore, after each measurement, the pads and discs must be cooled - when returning to the starting position, the driver does not use the brakes, the speed is extinguished by shifting to lower gears. By the way, that's why they chose a car with a manual transmission.

The average number of brakes is six. Sometimes, if the tires show unstable results, you have to add a couple more runs.

Continental tires, as usual, "brought" the closest rivals about a meter of saved braking distance. But what was our surprise when the new Hakka Green tires beat them by almost the same amount!

Moving on to more wearable exercises. The first is braking on dry asphalt. The technique, in fact, is the same as on the wet one, but we decelerate from 100 km / h - accordingly, the speed of approach to the braking point is 103-105 km / h. For the subsequent cooling of the brakes, it is necessary to make a larger circle.

In this exercise, I was pleased with the stability of the Continental - for many years in our tests it consistently brakes better than others. Nokian came close to the leader, but could not get up level - the loss was meager 100 millimeters. And Michelin upset - showed the weakest braking properties both on dry asphalt and on wet.

In conclusion - the most interesting and indicative, but at the same time the most difficult test for the pilot: the rearrangement, which is also called a single lane change. The driver's task is to find the maximum possible speed at which the car will successfully perform the maneuver and keep on a given trajectory, that is, it will not knock down any of the cones that mark the entrance and exit corridors. The races begin with a knowingly passing speed, and with each subsequent approach, it is increased by 1–2 km / h. It is not just the best result that counts, but the one that can be repeated.

On the one hand, this exercise is taken from real life - there are so many fans on our roads to fuss between the rows! On the other hand, it allows you to evaluate the lateral grip and drift characteristics of tires, the ability of the carcass to withstand sharply increasing, literally peak lateral loads and steering precision during extreme maneuvering.

The geometrical parameters of the rearrangement are also not sucked out of the finger - the width of the strips is 3.5 meters, as on a real road. But on the first lane, the "track" is clamped by cones so that on each side the car has a margin of no more than 100 millimeters. This forces the tester to use the same path at the input. The length of the transition from the left to the right lane is 12 meters. GOST for car testing regulates 12-, 16-, 20- and 24-meter rearrangements. And the maximum lateral load on the tires is provided by the 12-meter one.

First, a rearrangement is performed on wet asphalt, and at the end of the curtain we repeat this exercise on a dry surface, where the tires get more than in total in all previous exercises.

First, we were pleased with the accuracy of the final results. The tires in the last seven places have a difference in final points of less than two percent! In fact, this is close to the measurement error. Secondly, all tires have shown themselves to be very worthy, while their prices are more or less affordable.

Let us remind you once again about our system of final grades. Tires that scored more than 850 points are what we call good, 870 or more points are very good, and those that exceed 900 points are excellent. In the current test, no one dropped below 870 points! Seven test participants have very good results, five excellent.

The most pleasant thing is to see inexpensive "Russians" as excellent students - Nordman SX tires and the reviving Amtel Planet Evo. For times of crisis - the most tempting offers.