Summer tires for crossover: Comparison of manufacturers. Comparison of summer tires for crossover Continental CONTICROSSCONTACT UHP - Summer tires for crossovers, test

Choose the best tires for your car - the task, the solution of which every owner of the car with great or smaller success is engaged. Search for a suitable option, which would meet both mandatory and individual requirements, implies the presence of a certain experience. In this sense, tire tests for crossovers and tire tests for SUVs become the source of the necessary information.

Tests of tires for crossover 2020: Comparative studies

Tests of tires for crossovers conducted by experienced experts and independent organizations, reviews of new SUV class models, tire rating for SUVs, test drives of the shroud rubber - this and much more offers Tyretrader. The help of data obtained from tests can be an idea of \u200b\u200bthe quality of automotive wheels, safety indicators identified during testing of the efficiency of overclocking and braking on sand, stones, ground, gravel, snow, ice and dirt.

Test tests for SUVs will demonstrate how good the budget tires are available, the available value of which can lose their attractiveness due to insufficient comfort or wear resistance. Comparative tire tests for crossovers will help to compile an objective tire rating for crossovers.

Compare and select: Tire ratings for SUVs

In the study of the behavior of autoresin in the conditions of off-Round, it may be that the clamping force, the wheel slip, coupling properties, the strength of the sidewall, the traction force on the grass, the slope, the bumps and ughab do not correspond to expectations. Also, many tires 4x4 leave to desire better noise and rigidity that adversely affects the comfort of riding. Efficiency, noise level, accuracy of reactions of steering turns, the length of the brake path and resistance to aquaplaning - all this is determined during the tests.

Test results will ensure:

1. Obtaining information on the behavior of off-road wheels in extreme conditions, stability with rectilinear driving and turns.
2. Comparison of indicators of off-road rubber of different manufacturers, determination of the reliability of summer, winter studded and untouched, all-season models in urban conditions and off-road.
3. The ability to choose sports tires or models for compact cars based on expert assessments.
4. Acquisition of automotive tires, a tread pattern of which contributes to reduced rolling resistance to optimize fuel consumption.

To this end, Tyretrader offers its own tire rating for crossovers or tire rating for SUVs, having read the tests of authoritative publications: German magazines "ADAC" and "Auto Bild", Ukrainian Autocentre, Russian "Ruttle" and "Autores", Finnish "Tuulilasi", French "L'Argus". Test tests for SUVs, top reliable inexpensive rubber for crossover, news, video, auto owners are offered useful and interesting information.

If you read this material, then most likely, pick up a set of summer tires for your crossover. Immediately denote the fact that in comparison there are only road tires SUV dimension (SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE), for the average modern crossover (often having a drive only on the front wheels) spends most of its life in the city and on asphalt tracks, and "athess" Tires with a pronounced "evil" protector definitely lose the "civil" rubber both in manageability and in the comfort of movement on the asphalt.

The review took part in the tires in the segment, which were tested in different conditions at least two publications. By the way, the tests of three tests were taken as the basis of the rating.

The first one was organized by German Off Road and SUV Magazin magazines. The tests were made in the winter at Dunlop polygon in Mirevale in the south of France. Yes, yes, the summer tires were tested in winter, because in this area in the "cold" time of the year the temperature is stably located at 20 degrees Celsius, which is fully consistent with our summer conditions. Germans tested 6 tire names with dimension 215/65 R16.

The program included braking on a wet coverage with 80 km / h, braking on dry asphalt with 100 km / h, measuring the maximum safe speed when maneuvering, resistance to longitudinal and transverse aquaplaning, as well as noise and fuel efficiency.

Another German AUTO BILD AllRAD magazine tested 19-inch tires. In addition to standard tests on dry and wet asphalt, the wheels were checked on a coating clutch under road off-road. The results of these tests were predictable low, so they are not taken into account in the final rating.

The third test of the test was conducted by the domestic magazine Autored. The tests took place in the United States on a special price where various types of "parquet" wheels were investigated. The program included trials similar to AUTO BILD Allrad.

List of summer tires included in the "AUTODEL" sample.

Continental CONTICROSSCONTACT UHP.

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV.

Pirelli Scorpion Verde.

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 4 562

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Nokian Line (Zline) SUV - Outside

Test results of summer tires 2016 seasons for crossovers (parquets), segment carsSUV. SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE)

Continental ContiCrossContact UHP - Summer Tires for crossovers, test

Official information

Speaking of Continental CONTICROSSCONTACT UHP, the manufacturer firstly declares the tread pattern bionic circuit, also known as the "cat's cat". Its basic essence consists in an asymmetrical pattern of a tread with powerful side blocks and four or five drain grooves, depending on the width of the tread, which guarantees the CONTICROSSContact UHP tire, excellent handling on wet and dry coating even at high speed. In addition, in the official description, it states that the tire demonstrates excellent braking and control characteristics.

CONTICROSSCONTACT UHP is a special tire for powerful all-wheel drivers. Its characteristics - including a short braking path and increased turning stability - fully comply with 4WD cars such as Porsche Cayenne or BMW X5. For the wheels of special size there are tires of 23 and 24 inches, which is relevant for the tuning market and high speeds. By the way, the tire is produced in several high-speed indices V, w, y and z (for speeds from 210 km / h to 300 km / h).

TEST RESULTS

German tires perfectly showed themselves when braking on cheese asphalt, and generally earned high marks. A rather important factor is the predictability of Continental rubber - loss of adhesion when maneuvering on a dry coating occurs a little earlier than that of Pirelli, but this is "smaller", which allows you to respond to the situation on time. In addition, the low mass and resistance to CONTICROSSCONTACT is positively affected by fuel consumption, which also affected the final high rating.

Of the minuses, it is worth noting the tendency to insufficient turning on a dry surface and a high price, otherwise these tires are excellent for everyday exploitation in the conditions of the city and the route.

Note that non-identical models of the Continental brand model participated in all tests. However, they are all oriented by SUV segment cars. In addition, the results allowed them in one row. All tires equally confidently performed in all disciplines, demonstrating, mainly due to the balance.

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV - Summer Tires for crossovers, test

Official information

The Goodyear EfficientGrip tire with the asscription SUV is designed for light embodies, crossovers or parkelors. In other words, everything that is suitable for the definition of American Abbreviation Sport Utility Vehicle.

The manufacturer declares that the tire provides excellent performance indicators for the new Fuel Saving technology without losing in the riding properties. In addition, the Summer Tire Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV is safe for the environment - also reports the manufacturer. However, for the client, the safety and balance of properties is much more important. And this is also among the strengths of Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV.

TEST RESULTS

Goodyear tires showed stable average results in most tests, only a little inferior to Continental and Pirelli. At the same time, American tires showed high resistance to side aquaplaning, and also turned out to be the most quiet. Stable handling in any conditions allows you to recommend Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV to purchase.

Dumping a positive picture of unpredictability in emergency maneuvering and low fuel efficiency. For this reason, lovers of aggressive ride is better to choose tires with more "sports" characteristics (see below).

Pirelli Scorpion Verde - Summer Tires for Crossover, Test

Official information

Especially for the Sport Utility Vehicle segment, Italian shinniki packed all technologies previously available only in tires designed for light sports cars in the summer tire of Pirelli Scorpion Verde, focused on use on crossovers.

First of all, the tires are made of environmentally friendly materials and do not contain aromatic materials in the composition of the rubber mixture, which reduces the harmful effect on the environment both in the process of production and operation. The tread pattern in many respects repeats the drawing of the flagship model of the P-Zero Silver, however, due to the use of suspended loads, Scorpion Verde has its own technological features. In particular, four wide drainage channels, as well as a network of multidirectional channels, making water quickly and efficiently excreted from the contact spot. In addition, the optimized location of the tread blocks allows you to extremely confidently maneuver on the road at a low noise level. In addition, the asymmetric pattern of the tread allows the tire to evenly distribute the pressure in the contact spot, due to which the spot area is always maximum. At the same time, despite the fact that Pirelli Scorpion Verde is designed for crossovers and SUVs, its main element is a city and a route.

TEST RESULTS

Italian tires turned out to be very effective when braking on dry coverage, and in general showed enough "sports" temper. Pirelli allows you to speak well on the track, but a relatively low result in rain conditions does not allow these tires universal. Pirelli Scorpion Verde can only be recommended for operation in dry roast summer.

The disadvantages of Pirelli include a noticeable tendency to excessive turning and high exposure to wear. And in terms of fuel consumption, the Scorpion Verde turned out to be worst both, according to "Off Road / SUV Magazine" and the "AUTO BILD Allrad" measurements.

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 4 562 - Summer Tires for Crossover, Test

Official information

HANKOOK DYNAPRO HP2 RA33 highly efficient summer tire is designed for comfortable and powerful SUV segment cars moving mainly in civil roads. When creating a tire, the technologists paid particular attention to three characteristics. As a result, it was possible to reduce the noise level by 4%, to improve the grip on the wet surface by 8% and significantly reduce the resistance to rolling compared to the previous generation bus.

Enlarge Image Hankook Dynapro HP2 Tire Protector RA33 provides an effective removal of water from the road stain with an expensive, reduces the risk of an effect effect in the transverse direction, and also improves the grip on dry and wet road. "Acoustic" lamellas - slits of a special form - reduce the noise level. Increased stiffness of the central edge improves the accuracy of the steering. The component rigid rig, consisting of separate checkers, reduces the wear of the tire during the passage of turns and at the same time makes the handling of a clearer. The increased width of the treadmill and the balanced frame contribute to a more uniform distribution of the pressure in the spot of the contact and make braking more efficient.

TEST RESULTS

In the trials of the "cross-board" tire, the product of the Korean chemical industry showed the most controversial results. On the one hand, in braking on cheese asphalt, Hankook Dynapro covers turned out to be better than Pirelli and Goodyear, showing the low noise level.

However, these wheels have relatively weak resistance to aquaplating, a long braking path on a dry surface, as well as low fuel efficiency due to a large mass. Thus, Hankook Dynapro manifests both positive and negative properties and dry, and in rainy weather.

It is worth noting that in absolute Hankook indicators are not so bad. In braking on a dry surface with 100 km / h, the result of Korean rubber was 37.9 meters, against 35.1 meters at Pirelli (a difference of 2.8 meters), and 36.4 at Goodyear (1.5 meter difference). The totality of qualities, Hankook Dynapro HP2 will suit, for example, for residents of rainy regions that rarely leave the countryside.

Michelin Latitude Sport 3 - Summer Tires for Crossover Test

Official information

By the summer season of 2014, Michelin presents a new road bus with a sporty character for a wide range of Ozvodnikov - Michelin Latitude Sport 3. This is the third generation of Latitude Hamma Road Tires for powerful crossovers from Michelin.

Even before the start of sales, a novelty from Michelin has already been recognized by many leading automakers and received oligation to the primary equipment of such advanced sorts like Porsche Macan, BMW X5, Volvo XC90. This recognition was made possible by improving several of the most important characteristics to consumers at once: reduce the braking path on the wet coating by 2.7 meters compared to the previous generation of Michelin Latitude Sport, but also significantly improve the tire function, its strength and handling.

TEST RESULTS

The tires of the French manufacturer were in our review several "illegally", as they were tested only by AUTO BILD Allrad magazine. However, it is impossible to completely bypass the side of the leading supplier of rubber rubber "Formula 1".

In the tests of the German magazine, Michelin was rated a little better than Pirelli Scorpion Verde. This is reasonable to be very high resistance to longitudinal and transverse aquaplaning, low-noise tires and low rolling resistance, which affects the comfort and fuel economy. However, the high price and bad indicators of maneuverability both on dry and wet coverage led to the final low position in the ranking. From the positive qualities of Latitude Sport 3, an unexpectedly high level of clutch with the surface on off-road can be noted.

Nokian Line (Zline) SUV - Outtime - Summer Tires for crossovers, test

Official information

Nokian Zline is another innovative development from an elite Finnish manufacturer, having many outstanding characteristics. These tires will become an ideal "pair" for most powerful auto-class cars and will fully reveal the potential of the vehicle without prejudice to its own security. Like a real ninja, they will give their owner loyalty, accuracy of fulfilling all teams and complete silence. The most remarkable is that the tires are equally effective both on the dry surface and on the wet, and this is at any speed. Extreme loads, sophisticated weather conditions or poor-quality coverage will not be an obstacle for this quick warrior of roads!

In Nokian Z-Line everything is intended for speed and safety. So, the "smart" silica UHP was applied. As a result of a special cleaning, it produces extremely little heat, which guarantees the owner the durability of the autoresine and the longest conservation of all the initial properties, and if you add to this the enhanced structure of these tires, then be sure they will serve you not one year. In addition, the mixture is easily adapted to temperature changes, supporting the operating condition of the tread, even with the "flaming" asphalt. This property helps the tires to fully maintain all its characteristics on the wet road.

The basis of the high efficiency "zline" is an upgraded asymmetric protector. External and inner shoulder areas are equipped with powerful wide blocks, emphasizes Aviteh's specialist. At the same time, the outer shoulder is separated from the central part by a longitudinal edge, which limits the mobility of the blocks when contacting the track, which increases the stability of the car on the devias. The ribs, located near the inner shoulder zone, thanks to deep transverse grooves provide a stable position of the car on the road and ensure control accuracy. The same grooves are responsible for the removal of moisture falling into wide circle grooves separating the central ribs. Additional protection against aquaplanigning provide descending transverse grooves Ryoebert outer shoulder zone.

It is worth mentioning about comfort. Nokian Zline tires are silent due to the semicircular shape of recesses on the walls of the transverse grooves. Reminded a golf ball imprint, they are effectively fighting both with external and inner noise.

TEST RESULTS

Nokian Line SUV In the tests "Off Road" / "SUV Magazine" were able to demonstrate the best performance indicators on dry asphalt, and on wet coverage, Finnish tires lost only Continental. In the tests "AUTO BILD ALLD" 19-inch zline SUV showed itself a similar way - high predictability and neutral behavior in any conditions, had to bring Nokian first place in the overall standings of "parquet" tires, if it were not for one "but".

At the very end of winter, the scandal associated with the "tire frauds" of the Finnish manufacturer broke out. It turned out that the company for 10 years sent to the tests of tests specially prepared "rubber", whose properties were often very different from serial tires. For this reason, it was decided to disqualify both Nokian models with revoking results.

Let's summarize

Despite the fact that the crossovers at the moment there is a large proportion of the market for new cars both in Russia and in Europe, specially sharpened under their tires are still not very much. On the one hand, it narrows the spectrum when choosing "rubber", on the other - the specificity of the high dimension tires does not allow to enter this rapidly developing market to frankly cheap producers. As a result, the difference in the properties of crossover tires from different manufacturers is not very high. For example, when braking on the cheese asphalt, the difference in the results of the wheels tested in Mireval did not exceed 60 cm (from 25.9 meters from Continental to 26.5 by Goodyear). Thus, in terms of safety, all the models presented showed themselves positively, and it is worth choosing, focusing on the budget and its own driving style. By and large, any of the tested tires can be safely used on its Iron Kone. It is worth only to take into account the features of each particular tire, in order to choose the most effective option for specific conditions.

Text: Evgeny FED

Crisis crisis, and machines are sold, crossovers use the most sustainable demand. And tires for crossovers are a separate topic. They are obliged to ride well not only on asphalt, but also outside it. Therefore, the tests of such tires need to be carried out according to the extended program, preferably at the landfill with tariated off-road areas.

In Russia, such not to find. That is why we turned for help to Continental and occupied its polygon near Hanover. On the "continier" we have already spent tire tests and know that there are only asphalt tracks, let and with quite wide opportunities. Therefore, the rest of the tests, including off-road, decided to organize an ocean at the Continentaleal landfill in the US state of Texas. There are many asphalt tracks of different quality, watering platforms, and also primers, gravel and sandy roads. In general, everything you need!

Having consistently, it was chosen for testing the tire dimension 235/65 R17, suitable for most medium-sized osses, with the type H / T (or HT) - the so-called asphalt tires, the most massive, occupying more than 80% of the Russian crossover tire market. The remaining part shares mud (M / T or MT) and universal (A / T or AT).

Eighth International

The tests gathered eight tire sets of the most popular brands. Without a "top file", that is, five market leaders, can not do. Therefore, among the participants turned out to be the Bridgestone Dueler H / P Sport, Michelin Latitude Tour HP, Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV, Continental ContiCrossContact UHP and Pirelli Scorpion Verde. Two more companies are not so large, but having our own production in Russia: take the Nokian Hakka Blue SUV tires and Yokohama Geolandar SUV G055. In addition, included in the test representative of the fast-growing South Korean company HankooOok - model Dynapro HP2. It so happened that all eight sets turned out to be issued in different countries. Nor give or take - the eighth intermenimal.

What should be unable to include in the test program besides our traditional asphalt disciplines? Of course, longitudinal aquaplaning and light offrooud. After all, even on purely highway tires HT, the owners of crossovers sometimes leave for sand or wet grass, go through primers and gravities. And in real dirt asphalt tires decided not to drive - they are helpless there.

The main carrier of the tire was assigned Volkswagen Touareg.

On stand

At the Polygon "Conntom" located near Hannover, there is no section with off-road, but here a unique laboratory with expensive equipment, allowing you to quickly and with a minimum error to receive many interesting results, imitating real tests. For example, you can estimate the tires to rolling resistance. Usually we conduct similar tests on the road, determining fuel consumption. At the booth, this work can be carried out faster and with a smaller measurement error, the benefit of the technology has long been worked out.

The technique is as follows. Our subjects have load indices 104 and 108. Weiently focus on index 104, which means an extreme load of 900 kg. When tested on rolling drum drum, the wheel should be operated by the clamping force, which makes up 80% of the permissible, is a non-accumulative calculation 7063 N. Continental tests usually determine the tire resistance on the stand only at a speed of 80 km / h. We are working in our tests with two limits of speed - urban (60 km / h) and country (90 km / h). I had to ask Germans to rebuild the standing programs for the "Our" speeds.

On the stand, it was not rolled in one bus of each model, but two - and calculated the average value to level the possible variation of the results. The lowest rolling resistance was shown by Michelin and Yokohama - and the lower resistance, the less fuel consumption. More than the rest resisted Hankook.

On the roads of "Contidrome"

Scrapping tires on straight was also evaluated on the "continier" - in order not to spend time at this time in Texas. Amarok spoke with a tire, whose transmission was forced into the rear-wheel drive mode.

We guide the pickup to the left wheels in the bath with a length of 200 meters with an eight-millionth water layer, the right wheels are driving along dry asphalt. It is necessary to approach the scene of the measurement at a speed of 60 km / h. The measuring instrument fixes the difference in the angular speeds of the left and right front wheels with the help of individual wheel sensors. The beginning of the aquaplaning is considered to be a 15 percent difference between the angular velocities of the right wheel going on the asphalt (this is a real speed) and the slipping left, which pops over the road.

The best result was Pirelli tires: 92.6 km / h. A little earlier, goodyear tires (91.9 km / h) and Hankook (91.5 km / h) are populated. In Outsiders - Michelin (87.2 km / h) and Continental (87.6 km / h km / h).

Hi, Texas!

Multiple flight through the ocean, and we are in the south of North America, in Texas. Here, near the small town of Julande (Uvalde), almost on the border with Mexico, on the corporate polygon of the Continental we conducted the rest and, perhaps, the main part of the tests. The temperature during the tests rose to 80 degrees Fahrenheit (approximately 27 ºС). It is hot for people, but perfect for tire tests.

We work in parallel on two cars. On Tuareg, we begin to evaluate the course resistance at high speed. To do this, use a small high-speed ring. We draw attention to the clarity of the car reactions when adjusting the direction of movement and soft rebels to the adjacent strip. We take into account all the nuances of the behavior of the car. At the same time, you fix how easy it is clear to control the taouareg in such modes, we estimate the angles of rotation of the steering wheel and the informativeness of the steering.

Of course, do not forget about the inner noise and smoothness. For this, in addition to the high-speed rings, we use special roads with artificial pops and other irregularities.

More than others in the course stability liked the Nokian bus - it is on them that the taguega is the most dense, highly informative steering wheel and very clear reactions during infringement. But comments arose to Bridgestone's tires: on the straight of the car, the battered cars became unpleasantly empty and non-informative, and when the course is adjusted and change, it rotates almost without resistance, as the steering wheel at the boat. And since the reactions are fast, such an empty steering wheel is easily mistaken to more than necessary, the angle. By comfort against the rest of the rest, a quiet and soft michelin is highlighted. Only Hankook can compete with him in "silence".

Wet

And now - braking on the asphalt, covered with a half-and-and-andded layer of water. Modes - as when testing passenger tires according to the method of SR. The initial point of measuring the brake path is 80 km / h, the final - 5 km / h (in order to eliminate the impact of the work of the anti-lock system); Before each froze, cool the brakes, making a loop on the official road.

Having learned that you can check the braking on two coatings, agree with joy. After all, for the first time, the ability to compare the tires on the asphalt of different quality are slowed down.

Results We got damn curious. On the wet asphalt with an average clutch coefficient (almost like on Russian roads), the best results showed Goodyear - 33.5 meters. Continental managed to lose him almost half meter: 33.9 meters. However, on a smooth coating with a good "holder" of Continental with a result of 24.2 meters, it ran into the leaders, and Goodyear was only fourth (25.5 m), skipping the Nokian and Hankook tires. Stable worst results on both coatings - MicHelin tires (46.6 and 28.1 m, respectively) and Yokohama (48.6 and 31.4 m).

It comes a turn "wet" rearrangement. For this exercise, use the so-called short rearrangement: the width of the bands 3.5 meters, the change of the strip is carried out on a length of 12 meters long. The entrance corridor - under the width of the taguega, so that in each race there is a car on the same track: thereby decreases the measurement error.

In this exercise, all the Nokian tires were ahead: to them Touareg showed the highest speed - 67.2 km / h. Nothing amazing: these tires are traditionally strong in the rearrangement. Surprise caused Hankook, giving the Finnish-Russian product only one tenth: its result is 67.1 km / h. Closed the top three of the best Michelin, and with a big lag from leaders: 61.4 km / h.

But the maximum rearrangement rate is only one indicator that does not give a complete picture. It is important and what efforts it would require this exercise from the test: if seven sweat fell from it, the usual driver will face difficulties in much smaller speeds. That is why we also evaluate the handling on the rearrangement. And the best evaluation for reactions and behavior during extreme maneuvering is obtained by four tires - Continental, Goodyear, Nokian and Pirelli; Each we gave eight points.

Favor of fate "wet" rearrangement was performed on asphalt with a high clutch coefficient. Watering systems worked only on this site, and we could not disable them for the "dry" exercise. It had to be performed elsewhere, with more slippery (the clutch coefficient is lower than on the wet), albeit dry asphalt. That is why the speed of rearrangement on the wet coverage was higher than on dry. Wanting at least partially compensated for this shortcoming, we introduced an additional exercise - we decided to check the handling on the specialist, which by configuration repeats the similar path in the German "Conntomer". Here our estimates almost do not differ from those that were put up for the rearrangement. More than others liked Nokian tires - nine points for the most delicious handling: immediate reactions and clear, well-projected behavior even in slip, and their initial phases are very well felt. And the most stable in terms of manageability turned out to be tires Continental and Pirelli: only they earned the same estimates (for eight points) and on the rearrangement, and on the control chart.

Dry residue

Go to completely "dry" exercises. First braking. At the beginning of the measurement, the speed is 100 km / h, we complete at 5 km / h. The brakes are cooling after each braking, making a circle on a three-minute high-speed road, because Touareg is a heavy car and in braking with high speed brakes heated greatly.

And again we perform a trick with two coatings. First check the brake properties of the tires on the coarse asphalt, then on the smooth. The shortest brake path on both Touareg coatings demonstrated on the Continental tires (38.8 and 39.2 m); Behind everyone, as in the "wet" tests, were michelin (42.6 and 45.5 m) and Yokohama (43.2 and 45.8 m). But intermediate results starting from the fourth, showed that not all tires have the same position in the braking rating on different coatings. For example, by Bridgestone on the coarse asphalt the sixth result, and on the smooth - the fourth.

We repeat the rearrangement: the same dimensions, methods, cones, car and driver, only asphalt - dry. Once again I remind you that the clutch coefficient on this dry asphalt was less than on the wet on the other site. For this reason, the speed on the dry rearrangement was slightly lower. "Dry" leader - Hankook (65.3 km / h), very close to Nokian (65.1 km / h), Outsider - Bridgestone (60.6 km / h). In terms of manageability, the Nokian tires (9 points) liked the most, and the last place was Yokohama (6 points).

We repeat the evaluation of the controllability on a special track with a dry coating. Here, as in the wet, we make accents on the reaction and behavior of the car, as well as the simplicity and reliability of management. "Circle time, like on the wet track, do not take into account. And we again get small differences in the estimates: here more others liked Pirelli tires (9 points). What is noteworthy, there were no serious complaints to any participant - no one received below 7 points. Bridgestone earned the title of stability champion in controllability - only these tires have the same estimates in different modes, albeit modest seven.

A little off-round

These tests we spent in parallel with asphalt, since there were two sets of tires of each manufacturer. For these exercises, a Pickup VW Amarok (in Germany) and Nissan Navara (in Texas) were used - here you need a mon-drive car (with the ability to shut down one of the axes), which allows you to clearly catch the difference between the tires. Pickups were equipped with speed sensors on each wheel and acceleration sensor.

The first such test is an assessment of thrust on crude grass - we were completed in Germany, at the nearest to the "continier" herbal field. Amarok on the first gear moves on the grass with a pedestrian speed (5-8 km / h). I click on the gas pedal and accelerate until the wheel slip does not reach 70% (this is followed by a separate device). Acceleration of the car at this moment measures the sensor. Multiplying acceleration on the mass of the car, we get the force of thrust. A special program builds a graph of the thrust force dependence on the size of the wheel slip.

We use data limited to two points - initial 15 percent slippage and finite, which can achieve all compared tires. Experimed by this magnitude was taken equal to 69%. To sum up test results, calculate the average value of the thrust between the specified marks.

For the accuracy of the results of overclocking on the tires of each model, repeat twenty five times. Each kit is twice, with a periodic reconnaissance repeat on the reference (base) bus, with the help of which we track the change in the coating during the test (if necessary, taking into account the results obtained on the base tires, pass the final indicators). Still, the grip on the grass is not as stable as on the asphalt. The best result in this test showed the Yokohama tires: the thrust force reached 430 N. The Continental tires (421 H) were nearby, and behind all - Pirelli (385 N): the traction on the grass was 6% worse than the average for the test.

The definition of thrust on gravel is a test similar to the previous one. And the Pickup itself is now - Nissan Navara. With the only difference that under the wheels - the gravel road. The range of measurements is also different: from 15- to 75 percent slippage. The average value is calculated from the data of this range. The "strong" were the Continental tires - with a load of 443 N. Weaker than the others were given by Yokohama (399 N) and Bridgestone (398 N) - they have 5% of gravel worse than the test.

Tracting on wet sand is perhaps the most difficult exercise that requires long-term surface preparation. Sand should be pouring water and tamper heavy appliances. Pickup with tested tires, performing the role of "locomotive", is fastened with a rigid coupling to the truck and trying to stronger it from the spot. To do this, I raise the turnover and throw the clutch pedal. The force of thrust determines the integrated dynamometer into the coupling. This device starts measuring after a second after the complete clutch on the pickup; Measurement is performed over the next second, and then the dynamometer is turned off. Machina standing standing on the brakes is impossible - the rear wheels of the pickup can be touched on the sand, sometimes rushing around the hub. Sometimes the mighty "trailer" even falls after measuring with the help of a tight hitch push "tractor" from the holes of the holes.

We spend the next measurement by mixing the meter forward. Two dozen repetition give a completely reliable result. These tests, like the previous ones, are repeated twice - with the participation of basic tires. All races are conducted on the diagonal of the prepared platform to eliminate the heterogeneity of the sand "bath". The tires continental - 494 N. The most modest - bridgestone tires with a result of 424 N, which is 8% worse than the average.

On a sweet one more exercise from a series of light off-Round - an assessment of controllability on a special primer track. Touareg comes out again in the arena. The criteria are the same as when evaluating manageability, it is estimated not "the time of the circle", but the behavior of the car and the convenience, simplicity and reliability of the management of them. The winners here are three: Michelin, Nokian and Pirelli earned 8 points. Lowest score - BRIDGESTONE tires: only 6 points. The decrease in the assessment is due to delays in reactions, increased steering angles and tightened slides.

RESULTS

We decided to leave our system counting the final scores with a possible maximum of 1000 points only for asphalt exercises. After all, tested tested tires are created for roads with a solid coating. Since the number of disciplines has increased, the share of each exercise has been reduced.

On the asphalt won the tires of Nokian Hakka Blue SUV, scored 935 points, - congratulations! Moreover, the victory is with a fairly decent separation from CONTINENTAL CONTICROSSCONTACT UHP (914 points), which took second place. The three leaders did not hit Pirelli Scorpion Verde (908 points) - from the third place (it was taken by Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV with 909 points) only one score was separated. At the same time, the Pirelli Scorpion Verde tires can be called the Golden Middle in terms of price and quality ratio in asphalt disciplines.

Recall that tires that score 900 points and more, we consider excellent. The result of 870 points suggests that the tires are very good, and they are simply good to gain 850-869 points on our system. Only Yokohama Geolandar SUV G055 does not fit into the category of good tires, which scores only 826 points - very weak results in almost all the exercises. Literally on the edge, Michelin Latitude Tour HP is located with a result of 851 points; Its main advantages - low rolling resistance and high level of comfort, and on the coupling properties, it is noticeably lagging behind the main group.

For off-Round introduced a separate offset. The maximum possible final rating is 250 points, that is, four times less "asphalt". We consider such a wealth of estimates on the light off-road fair, because the owners of crossover rover on asphalt tires are rarely moved to Buaerai. In this standings, the leaders of the Continental CONTICROSSContact UHP tires, which earned 233 points.

But still crossovers - cars for all occasions. The perfect tires for them are those that and on the asphalt will not save, and on light off-road will not let down. And despite the first place of Nokian in the amount of two episodes (1160 points out of 1250 possible), Continental is the best, in our opinion, for the totality of qualities. Expose often move on off-road - stop your choice on these tires. They, perhaps, only one drawback is a high price. To those who do not afford these tires, we offer a "universal" version of a little more modest according to the characteristics, but cheaper - Hankook Dynapro HP2.

From tires Bridgestone Turanza T001, this time it was possible to expect a good balance of characteristics, because according to the Euro Arch system, they received "C" for economics and "b" for the grip on the wet road. At the same time, the Continental ContiPremiUmContact 5 tires have repeatedly won in various tests. Last season, this model of the German brand was presented with the added designation of SUV, but this year it was decided to refuse due to internal measures to harmonize the range. In the test, Pirelli Scorpion Verde tires are also involved, which, despite their belonging to the Scorpion family, which includes harsh buses for off-road, are actually purebred highway tires.

The most affordable Falken, Toyo and Nokian will compete with the Grande, and you need to say about the latest tires that in terms of design they do not demonstrate any desire to conquer off-road, although SUV abbreviation in their name is present. Nokian also has very good scores on the label ("C / A"), and unlike all other participants, their load index is 100. This means that they have an increased margin of strength at high loads, and that when determining the rolling resistance, it is necessary to enter Measurement adjustments. What naturally was taken into account when assessing evaluation.

For obvious reasons, much less high expectations were associated with the cheapest tires in the test produced by Linglong. The Chinese tire manufacturer is currently actively tried to gain a foothold on European and, in particular, the German market due to a large-scale marketing campaign, including, among other things, cooperation with the Wolfsburg football club. Linglong tires debuted in AMS tests back in 2007, when there are still very few people who knew about this brand, and then their indicators were, to put it mildly, not very high. Whether the fruits have brought the work of Chinese engineers who have done over all these years will show the results of the new test.

Ams decided to spend his latest test at the Sunny Italian south, however, when the tires were delivered to the place, the sun disappeared, and shower fell on the region. In principle, crossovers with such weather should cope, but for tire tests, stable conditions are needed, and here it was not necessary to talk about it. Therefore, so far Italy poured, and the water even began to wash off the car in the sea, the wrench remained not from affairs, and both brought Opel Mocco, the equipment and the "tests" themselves were doomed to inaction.

Finally, at night, the nightmare ended, the sun dried the track, and tests began on braking efficiency, handling and noise level. Two mocco were completely identical, which helped save a lot of time, because so far one circled along the track, allowing the pilot to evaluate the controllability of the tires, stopped from 100 km / h for the second time, to help make a tire rating based on their braking properties. On each tires were held 10 races, and the results were to be maximally reproducible, which demanded a complete concentration from the driver.

The results did not leave space for doubt - the fastest Mocco stops on the Michelin, Goodyear and Continental tires. Pirelli and Falken's tires behind quite a bit, and Bridgestone, Nokian and Toyo also got into a "green zone", but Linglong stopped only after 42.1 meters, that is, their braking path is almost five meters longer than the best tires.

In terms of a circle time on a dry track, all tires were expected to be close to each other, and Pirelli, Goodyear, Toyo and Michelin recognized the best and most speeds. Linglong tires are quite a bit behind the Continental, which, apparently, do not interact very well with the Opolev ESP. Be that as it may, with rearrangements at a speed of 120 km / h, all tires coped with dignity.

The main differences between the tires are traditionally obvious on the wet coverage, first of all during the measurement of the brake path. The first place went to Continental, and Goodyear, Pirelli, Michelin and Falken left for ahead less than meter. Nokian approached the leaders, Toyo and Bridgestone stopped the car near 28 m, and only Linglong braked only after 30 meters. In general, this means that their rating "C" on the label turned out to be quite realistic.

On the wet surface of the tires should provide a clutch not only when braking, but also in turns, and in the testing test, Linglong again there were serious problems, because of which the driver had to be very careful to at least stay on the track. Even on a circular track, where there are no quick load changes, Linglong again and again sent back wheels into the skid. Buying these tires is definitely not recommended. Toyo and Bridgestone are also a bit afraid of water, which is reflected on their behavior in turns and coursework. In addition, both tires are almost compared with Linglong in terms of enhanced aquaplaning sensitivity.

The best handling on the wet track was demonstrated by the Continental tires, whose excellent performance was only a little durable relatively weak resistance to transverse aquaplaning. Be that as it may, they have the shortest braking path, so that in the tests on the wet coverage they take second place. Goodyear, Nokian, Falken and Michelin also do not save during the rain, and BRIDGESTONE AND TOYO even be behind, but not so essential.

If this test was over, Continental, Goodyear, Pirelli and Michelin would fight for victory, but environmental characteristics also exist and first of all rolling resistance affecting fuel consumption. Efficiency is difficult to combine with a good clutch on a wet road, so engineers always have to go for some compromise. If you do not count the goodyear with the "B" rating, everyone else on the labels for rolling resistance was the estimate of "C", but the marking does not give a complete picture, since the legal limits of admission can be wide enough.

AMS conducted his tests using two separate dynamometers, and the tests have shown that only between tires with a rating "C" differences can already be up to 20%. The tone set Michelin and Toyo with a very smooth "licked" pattern, which helps save fuel. Goodyear with its estimate "B" is located in the center of the ranking, and Continental is located next to them. Regarding the tires in the last two places, it must be said that the rating of Pirelli was too optimistic, but in Linglong, on the contrary, very objectively appreciated the characteristics of their tires.

Regarding the results of this test, AMS noted that such discrepancies are a consequence of both the blurred classification requirements and the fact that the manufacturers themselves are exhibited by their tires, and the effective control over the accuracy of information on labels does not exist so far.

In general, if you need tires for the sport style driving, and the efficiency of fundamental importance does not have, then you can choose the Pirelli tires. If I would like to get tires that help reduce fuel consumption, and at the same time they were not particularly sacrificed for the sake of this clutch on the wet coverage, should be closed to Michelin. Continental tires, despite some small weaknesses, have become "specially recommended", but even they gave way to the leader of this test - Goodyear tires, which won thanks to very balanced characteristics and good results in all disciplines.

Estimates for tested tires are presented in the table
In all disciplines, the winner receives 10 points (the best results in each dough are highlighted in green, and the worst - red), and the remaining results are calculated depending on the difference with the best indicator. The weight gain of the overall assessment in the tests on the wet surface is 50%, on a dry surface - 40% and in environmental tests - 10%.

Experts "Driving" tested 11 sets of summer tires with dimension 215/65 R16 for compact crossovers. Asphalt tires were compared not only among themselves, but also with Tires with marking A / T (All Terrain). The company was close in interesting and diverse. Do you think the results are predictable? How wrong!
Tires for crossovers differ from the passenger not only with specific dimensions and increased lifting capacity. They have a stronger frame, reinforced shoulders and sidewalls. Such tire manufacturers label the inscription SUV or 4 × 4 or combine into special model ranges with original names.
It was. Nowadays, more and more bus companies leave 4 × 4 or SUV execution only for heavy frame off-roads. For parcktails, most of which are in our market forward-wheel drive and rarely come off with good roads, offer passenger tires. For the test, the experts of the journal "driving" were collected by representatives of all classes.

Personal composition

Among the eleven tested models, nine are created, mainly for asphalt. Of these, two, without having a "cross-engine" signs of differences, are represented by "passenger" names. This is an elderly, but deserved "German" Continental ContiPremiUmcontAct 5, made in France, and a timely "Taiwan" Maxxis Premitra HP5, cooked in China.
Four subjects are marked with SUV brand in the title, which indicates a crossover (enhanced) execution. Among them - the Finnish Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV and Nordman S SUV, as well as representatives of Asia - Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV from the rising sun and produced in Indonesia GT Radial Savero SUV.
The rest of the opponents are special models for crossovers and SUVs with original names. These are released in Romania Pirelli Scorpion Verde tire with Italian roots, the "Japanese" of Thai origin of Dunlop Grandtrek PT3, as well as a purebred "Korean" Kumho Crugen HP91.
To show the differences between tires of increased passability and highways, the experts included two models in the test A / T (All Terrain) label. This Bridgestone Dueler A / T 001 is a beginner with an aggressive protector and a Japanese pedigree, as well as the elderly domestic tire VIATTI BOSCO A / T. The drawing of its tread is more like asphalt than on the universal.

Battlefield

"Mobilize" all participants and deliver them to the team point - the AvtoVAZ polygon, located in the vicinity of Tolyatti, managed to the end of the summer of 2018. The air temperature during tire battles ranged from 18 to 30 degrees.
The popular Renault Duster was appointed to the post of car carrier. Used only 2WD front-wheel drive mode. This allows you to more accurately compare the tires, since the four-wheel drive is blurring the differences between rivals. Yes, and to life as closer, because buyers of inexpensive crossovers often choose the mono-drive versions.

Marsh throw

First, the hyperthellers rated the car on a 10-kilometer warm circle along the high-speed road of the landfill, where at high speeds noted how clearly it keeps the direct, how quickly performs the driver team when heated, soft maneuvering and the detour of obstacles.
In this exercise, the highest assessments were deserved Nokian tires, Nordman and Pirelli - Duster behaves in the best way. Gt Radial tires were shown worse: the tires of the GT Radial: the complete absence of informativeness and fuzzy reactions to the steering turns during smooth maneuvering. It is noteworthy that in the fighting with asphalt tires, universal did not become outsiders.
The long-term experience of experts "driving" in the measurements of economy suggests: the worse the aerodynamics of the car, the less rolling resistance affects fuel consumption. In the case of the Duster, the difference between the best and worst results of measurements both at urban velocity (60 km / h) and for the country (90 km / h) are minimal - does not exceed 0.2 liters.
On Tires, Dunlop and Toyo Duster showed the most modest appetite - 100 kilometers of the stroke, it spent 5.9 liters at 60 km / h and 7.3 liters at 90 km / h. Nokian tires, which were walked in both modes, demanded a glass of additives. Bridgestone and Viatti tires have reopened again in general.

And dawns here are quiet ...

On the service roads of the landfill, where irregularities and defects of the asphalt of almost all kinds are present, the tests rated the influence of tires on the inner noise and smoothness of the duster, including on a broken road.
The quiet was GT Radial, Nokian and Toyo. And the most noisy - Kumho and Pirelli. They collected a bouquet of claims: increased rolling noise, voicing road irregularities and rough asphalt.
Oddly enough, the Tires of Category All Terrain again made an equal footing with the highways, without losing it in either acoustic comfort or in smoothness. The driver of Continental, Dunlop and Toyo, significantly soften the shocks and vibrations, are better than all of the defects of the road fabric. Hard all, a shaking machine on large and medium irregularities, as well as itching on the seams and cracks, rolled Pirelli - they are the least comfortable.

Extracted passing

Completing the march, the test turns on the primer. On a 12 percent rise, it estimates the operation of the tires on the loose surface. This is not a test for patency, although the test procedure is similar - to evaluate the effectiveness of thrust with the buxation and without it, the suddenness of the wheel turning and confidence when maneuvering. The results of this test do not go to the final test, and are given as additional information for those who are forced to briefly move away from the asphalt, for example, on the village leading to the country.
Much more confident of the rest on the primer, tires with marking A / T - Bridgestone and Viatti behave. At Bridge Duster rushing like a tank. Viatti is pulling less than assertive, but still good. And the most timid - Pirelli. It's impossible to move on them with slipping. The driver is forced to focus on thin "manipulations" of the clutch pedal at the time of the Trogan, in order not to turn the wheels. On such tires with a solid surface, it is better not to move.

Pave! Once-two

Reliable braking is a security deposit. Therefore, exactly half of the 1000 points (the maximum of what can earn a tire in the test) falls on the results of the brake path measurements. On wet asphalt, the shortest brake path is Pirelli tire: 25.3 meters. Only one tenth meter lost Continental and Kumho. The worst result, 32.6 meters, showed Bridgestone; He lost to the leader of 7.3 meters, and this is a half car body.
Continental managed to play on dry asphalt, showing the best braking - 38.9 meters. And Bridgestone remained an outsider; The backlog from the shortest brake path was as much as 10.7 meters - almost two and a half housing!
The braking showed the weaknesses of tires of increased passability. Their aggressive protector is too "loose" for asphalt, and the size of the contact spots is smaller, therefore, brake properties and modest.

Bypass maneuvers

Next, the tests moved to the most difficult exercise - to the rearrangement, which simulates a detour suddenly arose on the road obstacle: at a distance of only 12 meters, you need to change the traffic strip.
On a wet road to avant-garde, Pirelli was put forward, which showed the highest speed - 65.9 km / h. The arrigard is located Dunlop with a result of 60.6 km / h.
Pirelli and Nokian, having received equally high marks, demonstrated their readiness for extreme maneuvers. And the least adapted to them turned out to be Bridgestone, Dunlop and Maxxis, complicating the control of the Duster.
All three received similar comments: slow down reactions to the rotation of the ram, which, with a sharp rebuild, you have to rotate to large angles, and the demolition of the front axle in the initial phase of the maneuver. At the same time, Duster in Dunlopes, pronounced insufficient turning remains during the entire maneuver, and Bridgestone and Maxxis in the second corridor make it revenge with the tail. Dry asphalt presented a surprise: Toyo tires with a "passing" speed of 66.3 km / h were moved to the fore. The GT Radial and Nokian, lost only one tenth kilometer per hour followed by them.
At this time, Bridgestone landed this time, its result is 63.8 km / h. The damage values \u200b\u200bof the "pass-through" speed was surprisingly duct - the scatter is less than 4%. We assume that the design features of the daster (first of all the long-time suspension) did not allow strong participants to truly reveal.
On the dry coating, Pirelli and Nokian confirmed their high marks for handling. And the Continental who joined him in the laggards "and joined him Continental forced the testes to sweat - the DUSTER hooped in them crossed the reactions in the reactions and the large corners of the steering wheel when maneuvering, as well as in the second corridor.

Terminal look

Six tires were gave out in excellent students: their results are so close that three double méstas were formed in the ranking.
Complete reviews standing by a mansion (out of the credit) "All-Russian" category A / T tires. They earned high marks in the passability, but due to the smaller area of \u200b\u200bthe contact spot and the larger mobility of the "tobast" tread ride a little on the asphalt.
Bridgestone Dueler A / T 001 earned 791 points. Showing weakness in the asphalt battle, he successfully demonstrated the important quality of the tires of the All Terrain category - excellent permeability. Weak strokes - low grip on asphalt and complex handling with extreme maneuvering - were quite predictable. But the acceptable level of comfort and moderate fuel consumption have become a pleasant surprise. Surely like those who travel a lot on roads without coverage.
VIATTI BOSCO A / T (854 points), which showed confident patency and satisfactory characteristics on the asphalt, may like summer houses and residents of the suburbs, often moving on the primer.
"Highway" Dunlop Grandtrek Pt3 scored 834 points, his place is in a group of mediocre tires. Economical and comfortable, with modest clutch and ambiguous handling, this model will only suit neat drivers.
At the eighth position, GT Radial Savero SUV tires settled with the result of 877 points. They distinguished themselves with a low noise level and showed themselves well in almost all the exercises. Only when evaluating the course stability and adjustment of the direction of movement at high speed GT Radial grieved our experts. Such tires are more suitable for riding in urban environments.
The best of the gooders - Nordman S SUV, who earned 894 points and who took the seventh position. It is well balanced - it will not surprise and will not disappoint, pleases with clear coursework stability and high comfort, especially on long-distance trips.
On the fifth and sixth places, receiving 903 points, the third pair is located - Maxxis Premitra HP5 and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV. Maxxis tires are high coupling properties and attractive price. However, sharp rebuildings are better to avoid. Toyo is the most comfortable and economical, will provide understandable controllability and enjoy on any roads. Only modest coupling properties did not allow to reach the leaders.
The next duo constitutes Continental ContiPremiUmcontact 5 and Kumho Crugen HP91, which earned 912 final points and divided the third and fourth places. In the listening list of these tires there are high coupling properties. Confortial tires will come up by car enthusiasts with a measured driving style, as they have flaws in controllability with extreme maneuvering on a dry road. Kumho will suit the drivers of any level, except that long-range travel lovers may not like the increased noise and mediocre course stability.
A couple of participants who demonstrated high grip and impeccable behavior took the United first-second place with the result of 934 points. These are Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV tires and Pirelli Scorpion Verde. The first is very comfortable and suitable for any roads. The second are noisy and harsh, because they are preferable to the asphalt coating of good quality.
The models presented in the test of "universal" models are only slightly inferior to the highway on dry asphalt - in the coupling properties and behavior with extreme maneuvering, compensating for this gap winning in the passability. In the remaining exercises - parity.

A place	Tire	RESULTS
1		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	10
		Lateral stability 15%	10	9
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	9
			10	8
			10	8
			10	7
		Total assessment	10	9,0
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	10
		Perestrovka 10%	10	10
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	10
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
			10	8
		Total assessment	10	9,7
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	8
		External noise 30%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	8,0
	Euromarking: b / a Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:9,5 Producing country:Germany	FINAL GRADE	10	9,2
	+ Good balance characteristics + Very good handling and high security on dry surface + Very short brake path on wet surface -
	auto Motor Und Sport: Particularly recommended
2		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	10
		Lateral stability 15%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	10
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	10
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	8
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	7
		Total assessment	10	9,6
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	10
		Perestrovka 10%	10	9
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	9
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	9,2
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	7
		External noise 30%	10	6
		Total assessment	10	6,7
	Euromarking: C / A Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:8,9 Producing country:France	FINAL GRADE	10	9,1
	+ Good handling (with a light tendency to insufficient turning) on \u200b\u200ba wet surface + Optimal safety level on dry surface - Low resistance to transverse aquaplaning - Next to insufficient turning on a dry surface - High rolling resistance - High level of noise
	auto Motor Und Sport: Particularly recommended
3		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	8
		Lateral stability 15%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	9
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	10
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	9
		Total assessment	10	8,4
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	10
		Perestrovka 10%	10	10
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	9
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	10
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	7
		Total assessment	10	9,6
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	10
		External noise 30%	10	10
		Total assessment	10	10,0
	Euromarking: C / A Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:9,6 Producing country:Germany	FINAL GRADE	10	9,0
	+ Good handling, high security and short brake path on dry surface + Predictable behavior at the clutch limit + Low noise + Low rolling resistance - -
	auto Motor Und Sport: Particularly recommended
3		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	9
		Lateral stability 15%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	10
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	8
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	10
		Total assessment	10	9,4
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	9
		Perestrovka 10%	10	10
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	10
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	10
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	9,4
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	5
		External noise 30%	10	7
		Total assessment	10	5,6
	Euromarking: C / B Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:10,3 Producing country:Italy	FINAL GRADE	10	9,0
	+ Good handling and stable behavior on dry and wet surface + No obvious weaknesses in terms of riding quality - High level of noise - High rolling resistance
	auto Motor Und Sport: Particularly recommended
5		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	9
		Lateral stability 15%	10	8
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	9
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	8
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	8,7
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	9
		Perestrovka 10%	10	7
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	7
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	9
		Total assessment	10	8,2
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	7
		External noise 30%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	7,3
	Euromarking: C / B Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:9,5 Producing country:Thailand	FINAL GRADE	10	8,3
	+ Neutral behavior and high accuracy of reactions on turns of the steering wheel on the wet surface + Short brake path on dry surface + Good comfort - Slow reactions on the turns of the steering wheel on the dry surface - High rolling resistance
	auto Motor Und Sport: Recommended
5		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	8
		Lateral stability 15%	10	10
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	10
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	10
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	9
		Total assessment	10	9,0
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	7
		Perestrovka 10%	10	10
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	8
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	9
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	7
		Total assessment	10	7,9
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	7
		External noise 30%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	7,3
	Euromarking: C / A Load indices and speed:100h XL. Tread depth, mm:10,2 Producing country:Finland	FINAL GRADE	10	8,3
	+ Reliable behavior, good controllability and high side resistance on dry and wet surface - - Not enough good stroke
	auto Motor Und Sport: Recommended
7		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	7
		Lateral stability 15%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	7
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	6
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	7
		Total assessment	10	7,1
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	8
		Perestrovka 10%	10	7
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	8
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	7,8
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	9
		External noise 30%	10	10
		Total assessment	10	9,3
	Euromarking: C / B Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:9,4 Producing country:Spain	FINAL GRADE	10	7,6
	+ + Good comfort - The tendency to excess turning and weak side stability on the wet surface - Weak braking efficiency
	auto Motor Und Sport: Conditionally recommended
7		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	7
		Lateral stability 15%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	7
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	6
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	6
		Total assessment	10	7,0
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	7
		Perestrovka 10%	10	9
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	8
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	9
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	8
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	7,9
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	10
		External noise 30%	10	10
		Total assessment	10	10,0
	Euromarking: C / B Load indices and speed:96h. Tread depth, mm:10,2 Producing country:Japan	FINAL GRADE	10	7,6
	+ Good handling on dry surface + High comfort stroke + Very low rolling resistance - Weak side stability on wet surface - Long brake path on a dry surface - Weak resistance to aquaplaning
	auto Motor Und Sport: Conditionally recommended
9		Tests	Max	Point
		Wet coating (50%)
		Braking 40%	10	5
		Lateral stability 15%	10	5
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	7
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	5
		Longitudinal aquaplaning 5%	10	6
		Cross aquaplaning 10%	10	6
		Total assessment	10	5,5
		Dry coating (40%)
		Braking 40%	10	5
		Perestrovka 10%	10	8
		Reactions on the turns of the steering wheel 10%	10	7
		Controllability (time) 15%	10	8
		Controllability (subject.) 15%	10	6
		Comfort / Noise in the cabin (Subject.) 10%	10	10
		Total assessment	10	6,6
		Ecology (10%)
		70% rolling resistance	10	6
		External noise 30%	10	8
		Total assessment	10	6,6
	Euromarking: E \u200b\u200b/ C Load indices and speed:96H M + S Tread depth, mm:10,6 Producing country:China	FINAL GRADE	10	6,0
	+ Acceptable handling on dry surface + Good comfort - Template to excess turning on a wet surface (even on a circular track with static loads) - Weak side stability on wet surface - Low braking efficiency - High rolling resistance

brand, model		Outside	9th place	Outside
Tin information
Country of manufacture		Thailand	Thailand	Russia
Load and speed indices		102S.	98h	98h
		300	420	N.D.
		8,6	8,2	7,4
		59	61	68
Tire mass, kg		13,2	11,9	11,2
Brake Path (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	M.	32,6	31,6	28,5
	Point	201,8	208,2	230,8
Brake Path (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt (Maximum 240 points)	M.	49,6	44,0	45,0
	Point	188,2	212,2	207,5
rearrangement on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	KM / C.	61,3	60,6	65,4
	Point	74,4	73,6	79,4
Maximum speed rearrangements on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	KM / C.	63,8	64,5	65,4
	Point	57,7	58,4	59,2
The amount of points		522,1	552,4	576,9
Behavior: expert assessment
Control by execution extreme maneuver on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	Point	48,0	48,0	56,0
Control by execution extreme maneuver on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	Point	36,0	42,0	39,0
and adjustment of the direction high speed (Maximum 50 points)	Point	32,5	35,0	32,5
Overcoming lifting on the dirt road (Outside)	Point	10,0	5,0	8,0
The amount of points		116,5	125,0	127,5
Comfort: expert assessment
Inner noise (Maximum 30 points)	Point	21,0	22,5	21,0
Smooth stroke (Maximum 30 points)	Point	22,5	24,0	21,0
The amount of points		43,5	46,5	42,0
(Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	7,4	7,3	7,4
	Point	59,2	60	59,2
(Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	6,0	5,9	6,1
	Point	49,2	50	48,4
The amount of points		108,4	110	107,6
		791	834	854
pros		Moderate fuel consumption; good comfort; High passability	High efficiency; excellent smooth course; Do not noisy	Sufficiently comfortable
Minuses		Low adhesion on asphalt; Complex handling with sharp maneuvers	Weak coupling properties; Complex handling on wet coverage	Adhesion with expensive below average; Fuzzy follow course

brand, model		8th place	7 place	5-6 place	5-6 place
			Nordman S SUV.	Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV	MAXXIS PREMITRA HP5.
Tin information
Country of manufacture		Indonesia	Russia	Japan	China
Load and speed indices		98h	98h	98h	98V
Treadwear index		380	500	400	340
Depth of drawing in width, mm		7,8	7,5	7,9	7,6
Scor rubber hardness, units.		63	66	58	63
Tire mass, kg		11,2	10,8	11,7	9,9
Security: coupling measurements
Brake Path (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	M.	27,6	27	27,5	25,6
	Point	238,3	243,6	239,2	257,0
Brake Path (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt (Maximum 240 points)	M.	42,2	41,6	41,4	39,1
	Point	221,2	224,4	225,5	238,8
Maximum speedrearrangement on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	KM / C.	63,1	62,6	63,8	63,4
	Point	76,6	76,0	77,5	77,0
Maximum speed rearrangements on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	KM / C.	66,2	64,5	66,3	65,0
	Point	59,9	58,4	60	58,8
The amount of points		596,0	602,4	602,2	631,6
Behavior: expert assessment
Control by execution extreme maneuver on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	Point	56,0	56,0	60,0	48,0
Control by execution extreme maneuver on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	Point	42,0	42,0	45,0	39,0
and adjustment of the direction high speed (Maximum 50 points)	Point	30,0	40,0	37,5	35,0
Overcoming lifting on the dirt road (Outside)	Point	5,5	5,0	4,5	5,0
The amount of points		128,0	138,0	142,5	122,0
Comfort: expert assessment
Inner noise (Maximum 30 points)	Point	24,0	22,5	24,0	21,0
Smooth stroke (Maximum 30 points)	Point	21,0	22,5	24,0	21,0
The amount of points		45,0	45,0	48,0	42,0
Efficiency: fuel consumption
Fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h (Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	7,4	7,4	7,3	7,4
	Point	59,2	59,2	60	59,2
Fuel consumption at a speed of 60 km / h (Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	6,0	6,0	5,9	6,1
	Point	49,2	49,2	50	48,4
The amount of points		108,4	108,4	110	107,6
The amount of points scored in the test		877	894	903	903
pros		High speed of rearrangement on dry asphalt; Silent	Excellent course stability; good smoothness; Low noise	Very economical; the most comfortable; Clear handling	Reliable clutch with expensive
Minuses		Mediocre course stability when driving at high speed	Significant disadvantages were not identified	Not enough high coupling properties	Mediocre manageability; Easy Claims for Stability and Comfort

brand, model		3-4 place	3-4 place	1-2 place	1-2 place
		Kumho Crugen HP91		Pirelli Scorpion Verde.
Tin information
Country of manufacture		Korea	France	Romania	Russia
Load and speed indices		98h	98h	98V	102V
Treadwear index		420	280	400	500
Depth of drawing in width, mm		7,9	7,3	7,8	7,8
Scor rubber hardness, units.		60	61	58	61
Tire mass, kg		11,2	9,6	10,8	11,2
Security: coupling measurements
Brake Path (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	M.	25,4	25,4	25,3	26,1
	Point	259,0	259,0	260	252,0