It is advisable to think about buying the best summer tires of 2017 in winter, especially when the New Year sales are not over yet. To help you make the right choice, we have studied the profile resources and compiled 2017 summer tire rating... When compiling it, criteria such as cost, popularity and the ratio of positive and negative comments on Yandex.Market were taken into account.
Average price - 9 380 rubles.
In negative reviews, users mention that tires are easily punctured and a weak sidewall, on which a "hernia" quickly appears.
The average cost is 8,820 rubles.
Disadvantages: make a lot of noise at speeds over 90 km, whistle in corners, very soft sidewall.
You can buy, on average, 8,241 rubles.
Almost silent Japanese tires, excellent braking and cornering both on dry roads and on the track after rain. Thanks to the thick and rigid sidewalls, there is no “hernia” on the tires after driving on Russian roads. These tires are easy to find on the market, so replacing them if necessary is not a problem.
Minuses: due to the stiffness of the tires, it can be uncomfortable to ride them with a stiffer suspension.
They cost, on average, 3,062 rubles. a piece.
One of the cheapest yet highest quality options in the top 10 summer tires of 2017 . These tires are soft, quiet, save gas and run well in small holes to absorb impacts. An excellent choice for car enthusiasts who prefer a quiet ride. Resistant to aquaplaning even in heavy rain.
Disadvantages: in the heat can "whistle" when entering a turn and braking.
On average, it can be purchased for 10,648 rubles.
But this is a very expensive option, in contrast to the seventh number in the tire rating of the summer of 2017. What benefits will car owners get from the purchase? Excellent handling of the car at high speeds, both on dry and after-rain asphalt, comfort and directional stability while driving and excellent wear resistance. This rubber will last more than one season, moreover, it has a rim that protects alloy wheels from scratches in a collision with a curb.
Cons: not for cold weather, dubbed already at plus 5 degrees.
The average price is 3,040 rubles.
The best summer tires if cost matters to you, and secondarily the silence of the tires while driving. This Japanese rubber copes well with deep puddles, and one of the reviews says that for 15 thousand km, the wear was only 1.8 mm of the tread.
Possible problems: soft sidewalls, because of which it is better not to snuggle close to curbs, does not drive well in mud.
Average cost - 6 310 rubles.
One of the best summer tires of 2017 (r16). Reduce gasoline consumption by about 0.4 liters per hundred km, according to the comments of motorists. Practically impervious to rut, stable on wet and dry roads.
Disadvantages: with sharp maneuvers, roll is slightly felt, small size (only 16/17/18 ").
Average price - Nokian Nordman SX
Inexpensive and wear resistant tires. Excellent handling on dry asphalt, "do not float" in a rut.
Minuses: not the quietest summer tires, behave mediocrely on muddy and wet roads.
The average price in stores is 5,010 rubles.
A very quiet tire that confidently holds the road, “swallowing” irregularities. The ContiPremiumContact 5 also has no problems with braking on dry and wet asphalt.
Disadvantages: soft sidewall, poor permeability on the road without asphalt.
It is sold, on average, for 3,410 rubles.
The first number of the tire chart is the best summer tires in terms of value for money. Resistant to aquaplaning, provides a quiet and comfortable ride on wet and dry roads. Due to the curved design on the tread blocks in the inner shoulder area of the tire, water rushes and accelerates from the longitudinal grooves to the lateral ones.
Disadvantages: thin sidewall.
How to choose summer tires?
Rating of summer tires "Behind the wheel"
Za Rulem specialists conducted a summer tire test to find out which new and popular tires are best used in the 2017 summer season. We provide a comparative table of test results and the rating of the editorial staff of "Behind the Wheel".
The bone of contention among car enthusiasts is the all-season tires, which are often the cause of long-term disputes. Proponents of such rubber as arguments argue that its use is economical and convenient, since it does not require regular updating of "shoes" and allows you to calmly survive city winters. Opponents, on the other hand, are of the opinion that it is possible to comfortably and safely use an all-season only at temperatures above zero, otherwise the risks of getting into an accident increase.
All-season tires are marked with the M + S mark, which literally means mud + snow. A similar designation M & S is often found on the summer and denotes a high cross-country ability. Next, we present the rating of all-season tires in the budget category.
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season
The world-famous Italian company that supplies tires for Formula 1 also produces all-season tires for passenger cars. A wide range of load and speed indices, landing diameters, width and height of the profile allows you to choose a universal rubber for any vehicle. All-season tires are distinguished by high braking performance on snow-covered and wet roads and good traction and grip properties. Directional stability is ensured by an asymmetric tread pattern, and due to deep drainage grooves, water is removed from the contact patch even at high speeds. When driving on a wet road, excess moisture is redirected by the cruciform sipes into the longitudinal grooves. In reviews of all-season Pirelli tires, car owners note a comfortable noise level.
Advantages
- Affordable cost.
- Minimal likelihood of aquaplaning.
- Effective braking on both dry and wet trails.
- Good handling and predictable behavior.
- Lack of noise.
- High quality.
- Excellent grip on all surfaces.
disadvantages
- For SUVs, Pirelli's all-season tires are not suitable as they are not designed for off-road use.
- The car loses control on ice.
Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10
Chinese all-season tires for SUVs and crossovers with a rather aggressive tread pattern, which, due to the chaotic arrangement of the blocks of an unusual shape, allows to increase the contact patch and provides stable grip on the track regardless of weather conditions. Large grooves effectively remove slurry and water and prevent small stones from getting stuck, which retains the shape of the blocks. Additional nylon cord, steel cord and reinforced sidewall extend tire life and reduce the likelihood of mechanical damage. In reviews of all-season tires, drivers note the low noise level, which makes the ride comfortable.
Advantages
- Doesn't lose control on any surfaces.
- Effective grip on wet and dry trails.
- Moderate level of wear.
- Good braking and no slipping in all weather conditions.
- Affordable cost.
- Comfort / noise level acceptable.
disadvantages
- Hard to overcome clay and dirt.
- Soft sidewalls.
Yokohama Y354
All-season tires for Gazelle and similar light and medium commercial vehicles. The design features of the model are based on its intended use.
The tread has a large pattern and deep grooves in the shoulder area, which allows the rubber to easily cope with mud in the warm season, but in cold weather it quickly becomes clogged with snow. Such all-season tires on Gazelle are best installed on the front axle, especially in regions prone to frost.
Yokohama tires are characterized by a long service life due to the deep tread and slow wear of the rubber itself. Fitting can be difficult because the tires are stiff and truck balancing is time-consuming, which is typical of tires with strong cord, high profile and deep tread.
Advantages
- Work resource.
- Good traction even down to freezing temperatures.
disadvantages
- Rubber is not suitable for use in cold regions, as it quickly dubs at negative temperatures.
Now let's take a look at the best mid-range all-season tires.
Goodyear vector 4 seasons
Car tires of this brand took part in the all-season tire test organized by the German organization ADAC. According to the results of the tests carried out, the tires took first place.
Vector 4 tires are built with weather-responsive technology to perform well in tests regardless of climatic conditions. All-season tires outperformed their competitors in many respects even in icy conditions: for example, the 4 Seasons braking distance is 11% shorter than that of similar tire models. Directional stability is supported by a V-shaped tread pattern. Water from the contact patch is quickly removed due to the deep grooves of the tread, which minimizes the risk of aquaplaning. Shallow grooves on the tire protect the rubber from overheating in the warm season.
Advantages
- Ease of use.
- Silence.
- Fuel savings due to rolling resistance.
- Good grip at any time of the year.
- Short stopping distances on any track.
- Comfortable ride.
- Resistant to wear and tear.
disadvantages
- High price.
- Poorly copes with snow riding.
Maxxis AT-771
An all-season perfect for crossovers without differential lock and electronically controlled - the affordable price, coupled with good grip on the wet track, make it indispensable. In reviews of all-season tires, car owners note their low noise level, which comes in handy when traveling on the highway.
The tread pattern in the shoulder area is poorly developed, so driving on dirt roads requires caution. The soft tread maintains good grip on the track even in winter at subzero temperatures. However, the price for this is quite high - AT-771 rubber wears out very quickly.
Advantages
- Good grip and handling on dry and wet trails.
- Quite high quality self-cleaning.
- Removal from the spot of water and snow contact.
disadvantages
- Loss of control when leaving the track.
- Rapid wear.
Now, here's the best all-season rubber in the premium category.
Dunlop Grandtrek AT22
Effective traction in all climatic conditions and excellent handling made the all-season Dunlop tires the standard in the configuration of such cars as Lexus and Toyota Land Cruser. The tires were developed specifically for off-road vehicles and for use both in the city and off-road. Directional stability and a continuous contact patch is provided by a geometrically complex tread pattern typical for winter tires. The risk of aquaplaning is reduced to zero due to the effective drainage of water from the contact patch by four longitudinal grooves. The stresses during sharp maneuvering are minimized by powerful shoulder ribs that protect the tire from mechanical damage. The heat in the summer is dissipated by small grooves and notches.
Advantages
- Almost complete noiselessness.
- Exchange rate stability.
- Resistant to aquaplaning.
- Effective and fast braking on wet and dry roads.
- Resistance to mechanical damage.
- Reinforced shoulder ribs.
disadvantages
- In the hot season, the rubber becomes a roll due to the winter tread pattern.
- High price.
- Scanty line of standard sizes.
BF Goodrich Urban Terrain T / A
The BF Goodrich brand of automotive rubber is well known to those motorists who often drive their vehicles into almost impenetrable mud. However, Urban Terrain tires are more suitable for urban SUVs and have a corresponding tread - asymmetric and as close as possible to "asphalt".
Car owners note in reviews on all-season tires that they do an excellent job with obstacles on the track thanks to the main tread grooves and small additional notches: aquaplaning is minimized, while it is possible to overcome rather difficult sections to pass. The tires are fairly controllable when maneuvering and barely makes any noise.
However, it also has its drawbacks, which it is advisable not to forget about the owners of cars that are not equipped with ABS: the braking distance on Urban Terrain is increased in comparison with asphalt tires, respectively, the risk of starting the car increases. However, this problem is quite common among all-purpose tires.
Advantages and disadvantages
Among the advantages, one should single out such characteristics as:
- Good ice stability.
- Effective self-cleaning of the tread from snow.
- Not a bad combination of properties for driving on snow, dirt and asphalt.
As for the shortcomings, the owners single out only one of the significant ones: the rubber does not cope well with sharp maneuvers and braking.
All-season tires for crossovers should provide a high level of cross-country ability, handling, comfort and emphasize the appearance of the car. In most cases, SUVs are equipped with powerful motors to ensure good dynamics, therefore, tires must withstand the loads acting on the wheels, as well as withstand mechanical damage when driving off-road and guarantee driving safety.
The choice of all-season tires for crossovers is quite large, manufacturers produce these products using various technologies. For example, products with the addition of orange oil, which provide fast braking of the car, or tires equipped with special 3D sipes to reduce rolling resistance. You can find the best tires by understanding the features of various brands of tires.
To simplify the choice of consumers, independent specialists conduct tests of rubber of various brands, based on the tests, ratings of automotive products are compiled, winners and losers in various nominations are determined. After reviewing the results of the ratings, a car enthusiast can buy tires without examining their qualitative composition in detail.
- Tire frame. The passability of the car depends on the reliability of the tire carcass; it should not deform when driving off-road.
- Passage of the car. Crossovers have to handle light off-roading.
- Aesthetics. SUVs differ from passenger cars in high seating position and large dimensions, so the use of inappropriate rubber can deprive the car of its characteristic features.
- Vehicle stability and controllability. The speed of reaction of the wheels to steering commands is tested, as well as the vehicle's course stability when entering a turn and performing emergency maneuvers.
- Wear resistance of the tread layer. The ability of tires to resist mechanical wear when in contact with the road surface affects the tire life.
- Braking speed. This parameter affects driving safety.
- Self-cleaning tread. The ability of the tread layer to be cleaned of dirt or snow residues ensures that there is no wheel slip.
- Resistance to mechanical damage.
- Contact patch of tires with different road surfaces. The stability and controllability of the machine, as well as the braking speed, depends on this parameter.
- Comfort. When driving on asphalt, the driver and passengers of the crossover should not feel even significant defects in the road surface.
- Noisiness. When driving, good tires should not make additional noise.
Top brands
We got acquainted with the results of testing all-season tires for crossovers, and also took into account consumer feedback and compiled a list of tires that have proven themselves in the car market from the best side and received positive feedback from motorists.
Scorpion Verde All Season Plus tire
This rubber provides excellent traction in various weather conditions, it is an improved version of the Scorpion Verde All Season Plus tires. Advantages:
- reduced rolling resistance;
- reduced fuel consumption;
- providing excellent traction for the vehicle;
- small weight;
- environmental friendliness, car tires are completely safe for the environment;
- provides a uniform area of contact when the wheels come into contact with the roadway;
- excellent displacement of water from under the contact patch of the tire with the road;
- good stability and vehicle handling.
Tires Maxxis AT-771 These tires are reasonably priced with fairly good performance. They are stiff enough to tackle difficult road sections and provide a soft ride. Advantages:
- good grip of the wheels with the road surface even in rain;
- low noise;
- lack of wheel slip;
- fast braking on various types of road surface;
- good grip at subzero ambient temperatures is ensured by the relative softness of the tread layer;
- good controllability of the car;
- lack of aquaplaning effect;
- tires are self-cleaning from dirt and snow.
Disadvantages:
- accelerated wear;
- there is an opportunity to move into a rut due to the underdeveloped pattern on the shoulder area of the tire.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T / A tire - increased stability of the tire carcass;
- long operational period, provided with additional layers of rubber;
- predicted machine behavior under various weather conditions;
- improved course stability;
- excellent adhesion of tires to the roadway under various operating conditions (rain, snow, ice);
- reducing car fuel consumption;
- reduced rolling resistance;
- self-cleaning from dirt and snow;
- shock resistance.
Disadvantages:
- accelerated wear during heavy braking;
- high price;
- slight loss of stability when performing emergency maneuvers.
Tire Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 A rubber designed for SUVs and crossovers. Aggressive tread pattern and chaotic arrangement of checkers ensure the stability of the machine due to the excellent adhesion of the wheels to the road surface. Advantages:
- continuous contact patch of tires with the road;
- reduced noise level;
- resistance to mechanical deformation;
- quick drainage from the contact area of the tire with the road;
- improved maneuverability;
- high level of comfort even when driving at high speeds;
- reduction of vibrations due to the reinforced sidewall of the product;
- moderate wear resistance;
- good braking and starting from a place in various weather conditions;
- affordable cost.
Disadvantages: Not the best traction when driving on muddy or clay surfaces.
Toyo Open Country A / T Plus tire The tires are designed for crossovers, SUVs and pickups, and are designed to meet the requirements of European motorists. Advantages:
- good adhesion to soil, sandy surfaces with low bearing capacity;
- low noise;
- good drainage of water from the contact area of the tires with the road;
- absence of deformation of the frame at significant loads and movement at high speeds;
- have increased tensile and tensile strength due to the unique composition of the rubber compound;
- excellent grip on wet surfaces;
- extended operational period;
Disadvantages: reduced stability at low temperatures.
Conclusion
All-season crossover tires are recommended to be used at ambient temperatures from -5 0 C to +10 0 C. In this temperature range, these tires provide the most comfortable and safe driving. The use of all-season rubber at lower temperatures will lead to its "tanning", there is a possibility of loss of control over the car. Using these tires at too high temperatures overboard will lead to overheating of the rubber, and their resource will be significantly reduced.
When choosing tires, you need to take into account the recommendations of the vehicle manufacturer, as well as the operating conditions of the machine. Do not assume that all-season tires are universal: for harsh winters, it is better to give preference to winter tires, and in hot summer conditions, to prefer summer tires.
2017-12-08 16:19:55
Is it worth changing summer tires to winter tires and vice versa, or can you still use all-season tires all year round?
The experts of the British magazine Auto Express decided to answer this question, who in 2017 conducted their independent test of all-season tires of size 205/55 R16.
Undoubtedly, all-season tires are becoming the mainstream for tire manufacturers as motorists seek the best performance in any adverse driving conditions. Over the past 12 months, several new all-season developments have been launched and the range of a number of existing models has been significantly expanded.
Even Continental, which has been an ardent supporter of seasonal tire change for years, has launched its first all-season product. Unfortunately, the Continental AllSeasonContact tires were not included in the test, since at the time of the test they were not yet available for sale, but the absence of this novelty did not become an obstacle for the expert group, and eight popular models were selected to find out which of the bottom is better. all suitable for year round riding.
Snow tests were carried out at Nokian's test site in Ivalo, Finland, and cold, wet and dry tests at Continental's Contidrome near Hanover, Germany. This year, additional disciplines were added to the test program in the form of temperature-sensitive tests of wet handling and braking efficiency, not only in cold weather, but also in warmer weather, which, according to experts, should fully reveal the performance characteristics of all-seasons.
All-season tires in size 205/55 R16 were tested this year and are suitable for many family cars. In addition, summer and winter tires (winners of the 2017 Auto Express summer and winter tests) of the same size were included in the test to show how their properties correlate with all-seasons in different weather conditions.
The Audi A3 and VW Golf hatchbacks were used as test cars.
List of tested models:
- Falken Euroall Season AS200
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S
- Kumho Solus HA31
- Michelin CrossClimate +
- Nexen N'blue 4Season
- Nokian weatherproof
- Toyo celsius
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse (summer)
- Continental WinterContact TS 860 (winter)
Test results
1st place - Michelin CrossClimate +. Overall rating: 100%
When Michelin launched the original CrossClimate in 2015, it was a significant milestone for the all-season tire world. Then the model took third place in its test debut due to a lack of grip in deep water and on snow.
The redesigned Michelin CrossClimate + tires have been redesigned to improve durability and maintain performance throughout their life cycle. In addition, the "AE" tests showed an improvement in wet grip. Although the model still does not like deep water, it won all the other wet and dry tests.
On the snow, the CrossClimate + tires were also not the best, but they still managed to beat two all-season rivals, and they are able to cope with the British snowfall.
Verdict: All-weather performance with the least driving compromise. According to the UK's largest online tire retailer Blackcircles.com, CrossClimate + is the most popular all-weather pick, with a score of 4.8 or more on a 5-point scale.
2nd place - Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2. Overall rating: 99.2%
The winner of last year's 2016 all-season tire test in the size 225/45 R17, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, in the size 205/55 R16, lost ground and moved down to second place. But this does not detract from the merits of the model. Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 proved to be the most effective in the snow test - best in braking and traction.
Unlike some of its competitors, it managed to maintain good performance in both deep water and shallow water, and in all wet tests did not overlook the Michelin CrossClimate + tires.
In dry conditions, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 behaves like the Continental WinterContact TS 860 specialized winter tires: the same lack of sharpness and weak steering sensitivity. Even so, the allseason's lap time on the handling track was just a second longer than the winner of the Michelin discipline.
In a fuel efficiency test, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 tires have proven that the controversial combination of wet grip and low rolling resistance is possible.
Verdict: If you want an all-season tire that is more winter-oriented, there is no better option than this Goodyear product.
3rd place - Nokian Weatherproof. Overall rating: 99.1%
There was a place on the podium for the silver medalist of last year's all-season test. As expected from the Finnish brand, it proved to be very reliable and strong in the snow. Both she and Goodyear tires had a clear margin of safety over their competitors.
Nokian Weatherproof, with excellent traction and good balance of properties on snow, was the star of the handling test. Nothing prevented these tires from shining in deep water, says technician Shina.Guide, but they did not perform as well in shallow water tests and the balance that Weatherproofs showed in the snow was not felt in wet conditions.
Braking performance on dry surfaces is also poor.
Verdict: A tire that definitely needs to be chosen for long rides on snowy roads.
4th place - Nexen N'blue 4Season. Overall rating: 98.3%
The testers did not expect to see the products of the South Korean brand Nexen, the N'blue 4Season model, so high in the final rating, but according to the results of all tests, they had to admit that the all-season took the fourth place quite deservedly. In three out of four tests on snow, the tires made it to the top three, were good in braking performance and handling on wet pavement regardless of temperature, while still providing a very decent level of grip in dry conditions.
The Nexen N'blue 4Season's problems are aquaplaning resistance and relatively high rolling resistance. If not for them, these tires could well count on third place in the overall standings.
Verdict: Good all-round performance makes these tires the best choice in the budget segment.
5th place - Falken Euroall AS200. Overall rating: 97.7%
The asymmetric tread design made it difficult to distinguish between the Falken Euroall AS200 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S. In almost all tests, they were in close combination, with the only difference that the all-season products Falken had an advantage on wet surfaces and snow, while the Hankook on dry asphalt.
While the Falken was second in the finish line on dry trails, it lost a full meter in braking performance to Hankook tires.
Also the highest achievements of the Euroall AS200 were two third places: in lateral stability on wet roads and in resistance to lateral aquaplaning.
In snowy Finland, the Falken tires had a slight edge on everything except lateral stability. However, as with the Hankook and the other asymmetric Toyo Celsius test model, cornering traction was less than most rivals.
The Falken Euroall AS200 was fourth in rolling resistance. Compared to the discipline-winning Nokian Weatherproof tires, they need 3% more fuel.
Verdict: Despite the aging design, the Falken tires still show decent performance.
6th place - Hankook Kinergy 4S. Overall rating: 97.5%
The asymmetrical design of the Hankook Kinergy 4S all-season tires was closer to summer models, while most of the all-season rivals had a directional tread pattern. At the same time, unlike the Michelin CrossClimate + “summer” tires, Hankook products are distinguished by a large number of plowshares and micro-cuts, which are vital for traction on snow.
In Nokian's White Hell, however, this did not help the Kinergy 4S, and they consistently came to the finish line after the summer-oriented CrossClimate +. The lamellas came in handy in deep water, but in shallow water tires with directional design “steered”.
The asymmetry of the tread pattern played a role on dry roads, where Hankook tires came in third in both tests. The rolling resistance turned out to be relatively high, which, as for a fairly new model, is a cause for concern.
Verdict: "Good on dry", but this unconventional approach for all-season tires is not suitable for other weather conditions.
7th place - Toyo Celsius. Overall rating: 96.4%
While the asymmetric Kumho tires had a certain focus on snow, the Toyo Celsius tires did not. In the white tests, they sat in middle positions and were more in line with the summer-oriented Michelin CrossClimate + tires. But at the same time, their grip on snow was slightly better than that of other all-seasons with an asymmetric tread pattern from Hankook and Falken.
Note also that grip on snow is most likely due to wet characteristics. The lack of wet traction was felt most strongly on the irrigated circular track.
The Toyo Celsius tires behaved more quickly on dry surfaces. They distinguished themselves with good steering and grip that were even more robust than the premium Nokian and Goodyear tires.
A bonus when buying these all-season tires is that they are quiet.
Verdict: It is preferable to use these tires on snow, in other conditions they are one step behind the best.
8th place - Kumho Solus HA31. Overall rating: 95.9%
Considering the fact that the Kumho Solus HA31 tires went on sale in 2014, the gap with the leaders of the test was quite small. The gap was mostly noticeable on wet surfaces, where in four disciplines out of seven they showed the worst result. However, on snow the Solus HA31's braking performance is noticeably better than most all-seasons. Lateral stability and handling on snow are also good.
In dry conditions, Kumho all-season tires brake almost as fast as Goodyear products, but with handling, as well as with the ability to optimize fuel consumption.
Verdict: It wouldn't hurt to update the model to better navigate wet driving conditions.
Winter tires Continental WinterContact TS 860. Overall rating - 101.2%. Out of credit.
The Continental WinterContact TS 860 result suggests that using good winter tires all year round is the best solution in case you don't want to change tires. However, this is not quite true.
Yes, the model took first place in the snow tests and also won some wet disciplines by a small margin, but its performance in dry weather conditions was less impressive. The braking distance of the winter tire was four meters longer than the CrossClimate + and eight meters longer than the Dunlop summer tire.
Summer tires Dunlop Sport BluResponse. The overall rating is 96.7%. Out of credit.
The increased number of wet tests and the inclusion of two ratings at "summer" temperatures allowed the Dunlop SportBluResponse tires to approach all-season tires in properties, but leaving them in service for the winter period would be the wrong decision.
Traction and braking of the Dunlop in the snow were much worse than that of winter and all-season tires, and on the handling track the testers did not even fix their attention on the stopwatch - the main thing for them was to somehow fit into the turns and safely cross the finish line.
In dry and wet conditions with air temperatures above seven degrees, the brake gap between Dunlop tires and most all-season tires was significant, which means that in summer conditions, only summer tires will allow the car to stop quickly and avoid an accident.
